PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DISSX vs. DLQAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DISSX vs. DLQAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Smallcap Stock Index Fund (DISSX) and BNY Mellon Large Cap Equity Fund (DLQAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DISSX achieves a 16.16% return, which is significantly higher than DLQAX's 7.86% return. Over the past 10 years, DISSX has underperformed DLQAX with an annualized return of 10.07%, while DLQAX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.07% annualized return.


DISSX

1D
0.90%
1M
2.55%
YTD
16.16%
6M
14.84%
1Y
32.05%
3Y*
13.35%
5Y*
4.92%
10Y*
10.07%

DLQAX

1D
0.32%
1M
4.29%
YTD
7.86%
6M
7.88%
1Y
22.96%
3Y*
17.72%
5Y*
8.87%
10Y*
13.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DISSX vs. DLQAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DISSX
BNY Mellon Smallcap Stock Index Fund
16.16%5.41%6.87%14.24%-16.71%26.41%10.92%22.28%-8.30%12.40%
DLQAX
BNY Mellon Large Cap Equity Fund
7.86%14.27%21.29%16.81%-23.77%27.21%23.57%29.30%-6.06%24.54%

Correlation

The correlation between DISSX and DLQAX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 1997

0.82

The correlation between DISSX and DLQAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DISSX vs. DLQAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DISSX
DISSX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
DISSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DISSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
DISSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
DISSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
DISSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

DLQAX
DLQAX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
DLQAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DLQAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
DLQAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
DLQAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
DLQAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DISSX vs. DLQAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Smallcap Stock Index Fund (DISSX) and BNY Mellon Large Cap Equity Fund (DLQAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DISSXDLQAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.35

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.93

2.47

+1.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.11

10.58

+2.53

DISSX vs. DLQAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DISSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is comparable to the DLQAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DISSX and DLQAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DISSXDLQAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.96

1.96

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

0.51

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.70

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.26

+0.14

Drawdowns

DISSX vs. DLQAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DISSX drawdown since its inception was -58.30%, smaller than the maximum DLQAX drawdown of -70.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DISSX and DLQAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DISSXDLQAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.30%

-70.38%

+12.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.75%

-9.63%

+0.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.02%

-22.44%

-6.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.02%

-30.77%

+1.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.45%

-34.33%

-10.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.04%

0.00%

-0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.57%

-18.68%

+9.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.62%

2.24%

+0.38%

Volatility

DISSX vs. DLQAX - Volatility Comparison

BNY Mellon Smallcap Stock Index Fund (DISSX) has a higher volatility of 4.49% compared to BNY Mellon Large Cap Equity Fund (DLQAX) at 2.88%. This indicates that DISSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DLQAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DISSXDLQAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.49%

2.88%

+1.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.73%

9.09%

+2.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.58%

12.12%

+5.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.49%

17.63%

+3.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.17%

18.79%

+4.38%

DISSX vs. DLQAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DISSX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than DLQAX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

DISSX vs. DLQAX - Dividend Comparison

DISSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.28%, less than DLQAX's 23.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DISSX
BNY Mellon Smallcap Stock Index Fund
13.28%15.42%14.79%8.20%13.87%10.72%7.61%8.35%13.18%7.40%6.49%11.30%
DLQAX
BNY Mellon Large Cap Equity Fund
23.30%21.34%47.67%35.24%15.74%14.22%3.69%4.70%15.48%3.90%1.90%5.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


DISSX and DLQAX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DISSX has higher volatility (4.49%) compared to DLQAX (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DISSX dropped -58.30% vs DLQAX's -70.38%.

DLQAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DISSX and DLQAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer