DIS vs. PDBC
DIS (The Walt Disney Company) is a stock, while PDBC (Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF) is Commodities fund actively managed by Invesco. Over the past 10 years, DIS returned 0.52%/yr vs 7.96%/yr for PDBC. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
DIS vs. PDBC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DIS achieves a -14.35% return, which is significantly lower than PDBC's 25.43% return. Over the past 10 years, DIS has underperformed PDBC with an annualized return of 0.52%, while PDBC has yielded a comparatively higher 7.96% annualized return.
DIS
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- -1.45%
- 6M
- -13.70%
- YTD
- -14.35%
- 1Y
- -19.47%
- 3Y*
- 4.01%
- 5Y*
- -10.84%
- 10Y*
- 0.52%
PDBC
- 1D
- 1.84%
- 1M
- -5.68%
- 6M
- 23.94%
- YTD
- 25.43%
- 1Y
- 29.62%
- 3Y*
- 10.89%
- 5Y*
- 10.46%
- 10Y*
- 7.96%
DIS vs. PDBC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIS The Walt Disney Company | -14.35% | 3.30% | 24.44% | 4.26% | -43.91% | -14.51% | 25.27% | 33.51% | 3.61% | 4.76% |
PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 25.43% | 5.96% | 2.09% | -6.25% | 19.23% | 41.72% | -7.84% | 11.44% | -12.78% | 5.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between DIS and PDBC is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2014 | 0.16 |
The correlation between DIS and PDBC shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DIS vs. PDBC — Risk / Return Rank
DIS
PDBC
DIS vs. PDBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Walt Disney Company (DIS) and Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DIS | PDBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.28 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.80 | 1.80 | -2.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.54 | 6.62 | -8.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DIS vs. PDBC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DIS drawdown since its inception was -85.66%, which is greater than PDBC's maximum drawdown of -49.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIS and PDBC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DIS | PDBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.66% | -49.52% | -36.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.32% | -16.55% | -7.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.86% | -16.55% | -16.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.33% | -27.63% | -29.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -60.72% | -40.73% | -19.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.60% | -12.11% | -38.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.80% | -23.12% | -3.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.68% | 4.49% | +8.19% |
Volatility
DIS vs. PDBC - Volatility Comparison
The Walt Disney Company (DIS) has a higher volatility of 7.81% compared to Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC) at 5.63%. This indicates that DIS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PDBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DIS | PDBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.81% | 5.63% | +2.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.07% | 16.57% | +3.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.99% | 18.67% | +6.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.48% | 19.20% | +10.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.84% | 17.75% | +11.09% |
Dividends
DIS vs. PDBC - Dividend Comparison
DIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, less than PDBC's 3.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIS The Walt Disney Company | 1.55% | 1.10% | 0.85% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.22% | 1.57% | 1.51% | 1.43% | 1.30% |
PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 3.06% | 3.84% | 4.42% | 4.21% | 13.05% | 50.83% | 0.01% | 1.40% | 1.00% | 3.83% | 6.51% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DIS and PDBC have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DIS has higher volatility (7.81%) compared to PDBC (5.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIS dropped -85.66% vs PDBC's -49.52%.
PDBC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs -0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DIS and PDBC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer