DIS vs. GILD
DIS (The Walt Disney Company) and GILD (Gilead Sciences, Inc.) are both stocks. DIS operates in Entertainment (Communication Services), while GILD operates in Drug Manufacturers - General (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, DIS returned 0.96%/yr vs 7.71%/yr for GILD. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
DIS vs. GILD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DIS achieves a -12.36% return, which is significantly lower than GILD's 5.83% return. Over the past 10 years, DIS has underperformed GILD with an annualized return of 0.96%, while GILD has yielded a comparatively higher 7.71% annualized return.
DIS
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- -7.73%
- YTD
- -12.36%
- 6M
- -4.67%
- 1Y
- -10.41%
- 3Y*
- 3.46%
- 5Y*
- -10.45%
- 10Y*
- 0.96%
GILD
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- -5.24%
- YTD
- 5.83%
- 6M
- 7.86%
- 1Y
- 20.04%
- 3Y*
- 23.34%
- 5Y*
- 18.21%
- 10Y*
- 7.71%
DIS vs. GILD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIS The Walt Disney Company | -12.36% | 3.30% | 24.44% | 4.26% | -43.91% | -14.51% | 25.27% | 33.51% | 3.61% | 4.76% |
GILD Gilead Sciences, Inc. | 5.83% | 36.59% | 18.68% | -1.99% | 23.63% | 29.95% | -6.70% | 7.88% | -9.92% | 2.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between DIS and GILD is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 1992 | 0.25 |
Fundamentals
DIS:
$176.69B
GILD:
$161.97B
DIS:
$6.25
GILD:
$7.35
DIS:
15.95
GILD:
17.57
DIS:
0.22
GILD:
0.04
DIS:
1.84
GILD:
5.45
DIS:
1.63
GILD:
6.89
DIS:
$97.26B
GILD:
$29.74B
DIS:
$36.14B
GILD:
$18.74B
DIS:
$20.74B
GILD:
$12.88B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DIS vs. GILD — Risk / Return Rank
DIS
GILD
DIS vs. GILD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Walt Disney Company (DIS) and Gilead Sciences, Inc. (GILD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DIS | GILD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.15 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.42 | 1.14 | -1.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.86 | 2.82 | -3.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DIS | GILD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.43 | 0.77 | -1.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.36 | 0.76 | -1.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.03 | 0.30 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.39 | -0.05 |
Drawdowns
DIS vs. GILD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DIS drawdown since its inception was -85.66%, which is greater than GILD's maximum drawdown of -70.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIS and GILD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DIS | GILD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.66% | -70.83% | -14.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.97% | -17.65% | -7.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.86% | -26.59% | -6.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.33% | -26.59% | -30.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -60.72% | -30.47% | -30.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.45% | -16.63% | -32.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.77% | -22.16% | -4.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.17% | 7.13% | +5.04% |
Volatility
DIS vs. GILD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for The Walt Disney Company (DIS) is 6.18%, while Gilead Sciences, Inc. (GILD) has a volatility of 6.88%. This indicates that DIS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GILD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DIS | GILD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.18% | 6.88% | -0.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.36% | 18.53% | +0.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.32% | 26.31% | -1.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.31% | 24.02% | +5.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.76% | 25.48% | +3.28% |
Dividends
DIS vs. GILD - Dividend Comparison
DIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, less than GILD's 2.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIS The Walt Disney Company | 1.25% | 1.10% | 0.85% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.22% | 1.57% | 1.51% | 1.43% | 1.30% |
GILD Gilead Sciences, Inc. | 2.47% | 2.57% | 3.33% | 3.70% | 3.40% | 3.91% | 4.67% | 3.88% | 3.65% | 2.90% | 2.57% | 1.27% |
Financials
DIS vs. GILD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Walt Disney Company and Gilead Sciences, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
DIS vs. GILD - Profitability Comparison
DIS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Walt Disney Company reported a gross profit of 9.27B and revenue of 25.17B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.
GILD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gilead Sciences, Inc. reported a gross profit of 79.20M and revenue of 6.96B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 1.1%.
DIS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Walt Disney Company reported an operating income of 4.96B and revenue of 25.17B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.7%.
GILD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gilead Sciences, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.59B and revenue of 6.96B, resulting in an operating margin of 37.2%.
DIS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Walt Disney Company reported a net income of 2.25B and revenue of 25.17B, resulting in a net margin of 8.9%.
GILD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gilead Sciences, Inc. reported a net income of 2.02B and revenue of 6.96B, resulting in a net margin of 29.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
DIS and GILD have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GILD has higher volatility (6.88%) compared to DIS (6.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIS dropped -85.66% vs GILD's -70.83%.
GILD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.77 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DIS and GILD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer