DIME vs. IBLC
DIME (CoinShares Altcoins ETF) and IBLC (iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. DIME is actively managed, while IBLC is passively managed. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DIME charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for IBLC.
Performance
DIME vs. IBLC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DIME achieves a -18.48% return, which is significantly lower than IBLC's 32.34% return.
DIME
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 12.70%
- YTD
- -18.48%
- 6M
- -31.41%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBLC
- 1D
- -3.00%
- 1M
- 13.52%
- YTD
- 32.34%
- 6M
- 15.25%
- 1Y
- 73.27%
- 3Y*
- 48.31%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DIME vs. IBLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DIME CoinShares Altcoins ETF | -18.48% | -54.22% |
IBLC iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF | 32.34% | -31.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between DIME and IBLC is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2025 | 0.56 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DIME vs. IBLC — Risk / Return Rank
DIME
IBLC
DIME vs. IBLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoinShares Altcoins ETF (DIME) and iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DIME | IBLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.34 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.01 | 0.40 | -1.41 |
Drawdowns
DIME vs. IBLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DIME drawdown since its inception was -70.25%, which is greater than IBLC's maximum drawdown of -62.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIME and IBLC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DIME | IBLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.25% | -62.54% | -7.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -44.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -51.68% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -63.50% | -12.99% | -50.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -54.65% | -25.89% | -28.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 22.56% | — |
Volatility
DIME vs. IBLC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DIME | IBLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 14.67% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 40.76% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 77.39% | 54.94% | +22.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 77.39% | 64.49% | +12.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 77.39% | 64.49% | +12.90% |
DIME vs. IBLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
DIME has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than IBLC's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
DIME vs. IBLC - Dividend Comparison
DIME has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.77%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIME CoinShares Altcoins ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IBLC iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF | 4.77% | 6.31% | 1.60% | 1.79% | 0.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DIME and IBLC have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DIME is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DIME is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for IBLC.
IBLC has the higher dividend yield at 4.77%, compared with 0.00% for DIME.
They also come from different issuers: CoinShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for DIME and 0.47% for IBLC.
Find the right allocation for DIME and IBLC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer