DIG vs. MSFT
DIG (ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas) is Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Oil & Gas Index (200%), while MSFT (Microsoft Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, DIG returned 3.76%/yr vs 23.85%/yr for MSFT. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
DIG vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DIG achieves a 44.39% return, which is significantly higher than MSFT's -22.33% return. Over the past 10 years, DIG has underperformed MSFT with an annualized return of 3.76%, while MSFT has yielded a comparatively higher 23.85% annualized return.
DIG
- 1D
- 1.37%
- 1M
- -15.65%
- YTD
- 44.39%
- 6M
- 45.60%
- 1Y
- 53.89%
- 3Y*
- 19.73%
- 5Y*
- 24.80%
- 10Y*
- 3.76%
MSFT
- 1D
- 1.80%
- 1M
- -10.66%
- YTD
- -22.33%
- 6M
- -22.85%
- 1Y
- -22.44%
- 3Y*
- 4.54%
- 5Y*
- 7.88%
- 10Y*
- 23.85%
DIG vs. MSFT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIG ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas | 44.39% | 2.73% | 0.93% | -13.04% | 125.34% | 115.63% | -70.36% | 12.51% | -40.11% | -7.39% |
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | -22.33% | 15.58% | 12.93% | 58.19% | -28.02% | 52.48% | 42.53% | 57.56% | 20.80% | 40.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between DIG and MSFT is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2007 | 0.33 |
The correlation between DIG and MSFT shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.33 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DIG vs. MSFT — Risk / Return Rank
DIG
MSFT
DIG vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas (DIG) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DIG | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 0.86 | +0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.92 | -0.66 | +2.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.59 | -1.32 | +6.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DIG vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DIG drawdown since its inception was -97.04%, which is greater than MSFT's maximum drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIG and MSFT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DIG | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.04% | -69.38% | -27.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.23% | -33.91% | +5.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.41% | -33.91% | -8.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.02% | -37.15% | -8.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -92.53% | -37.15% | -55.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -57.70% | -30.58% | -27.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -64.33% | -21.79% | -42.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.68% | 17.08% | -7.40% |
Volatility
DIG vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas (DIG) has a higher volatility of 14.13% compared to Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) at 11.34%. This indicates that DIG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DIG | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.13% | 11.34% | +2.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.67% | 22.94% | +10.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.74% | 26.02% | +15.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.53% | 26.79% | +24.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 57.83% | 27.09% | +30.74% |
Dividends
DIG vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison
DIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, more than MSFT's 0.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIG ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas | 1.72% | 2.62% | 3.13% | 0.61% | 1.33% | 2.24% | 3.18% | 2.72% | 2.30% | 1.76% | 1.09% | 1.56% |
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 0.95% | 0.70% | 0.73% | 0.74% | 1.06% | 0.68% | 0.94% | 1.20% | 1.69% | 1.86% | 2.37% | 2.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DIG and MSFT have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DIG has higher volatility (14.13%) compared to MSFT (11.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIG dropped -97.04% vs MSFT's -69.38%.
DIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs -0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DIG and MSFT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer