DIG vs. BSMW
DIG (ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas) and BSMW (Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DIG is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Oil & Gas Index (200%), while BSMW is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the Invesco BulletShares USD Municipal Bond 2032 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DIG returned 24.00%/yr vs 3.23%/yr for BSMW. At a correlation of -0.13, they often move in opposite directions. DIG charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for BSMW.
Performance
DIG vs. BSMW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DIG achieves a 66.82% return, which is significantly higher than BSMW's 1.28% return.
DIG
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -3.40%
- YTD
- 66.82%
- 6M
- 58.48%
- 1Y
- 98.04%
- 3Y*
- 24.00%
- 5Y*
- 28.36%
- 10Y*
- 4.90%
BSMW
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.65%
- YTD
- 1.28%
- 6M
- 1.64%
- 1Y
- 6.54%
- 3Y*
- 3.23%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DIG vs. BSMW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DIG ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas | 66.82% | 2.73% | 0.93% | -6.77% |
BSMW Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF | 1.28% | 3.42% | -0.35% | 7.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between DIG and BSMW is -0.30, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2023 | -0.13 |
The correlation between DIG and BSMW shifts across timeframes, from -0.30 (1 year) to -0.11 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DIG vs. BSMW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DIG
BSMW
Energy
-
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Energy
DIG
BSMW
-
Financial Services
DIG
BSMW
Basic Materials
DIG
-
BSMW
-
Communication Services
DIG
-
BSMW
-
Consumer Cyclical
DIG
-
BSMW
Consumer Defensive
DIG
-
BSMW
-
Healthcare
DIG
-
BSMW
-
Industrials
DIG
-
BSMW
-
Real Estate
DIG
-
BSMW
-
Technology
DIG
-
BSMW
Utilities
DIG
-
BSMW
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DIG vs. BSMW — Risk / Return Rank
DIG
BSMW
DIG vs. BSMW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas (DIG) and Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DIG | BSMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.47 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.23 | 2.25 | +1.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.54 | 7.09 | +4.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DIG | BSMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.43 | 2.35 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.09 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.00 | 0.69 | -0.69 |
Drawdowns
DIG vs. BSMW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DIG drawdown since its inception was -97.04%, which is greater than BSMW's maximum drawdown of -7.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIG and BSMW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DIG | BSMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.04% | -7.57% | -89.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.29% | -2.92% | -20.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.41% | -7.34% | -35.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.02% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -92.53% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -51.13% | -1.00% | -50.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -64.36% | -1.72% | -62.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.52% | 0.92% | +7.60% |
Volatility
DIG vs. BSMW - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas (DIG) has a higher volatility of 16.57% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMW) at 0.92%. This indicates that DIG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSMW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DIG | BSMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.57% | 0.92% | +15.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.00% | 1.97% | +31.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.83% | 2.81% | +38.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.59% | 5.00% | +46.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 57.80% | 5.00% | +52.80% |
DIG vs. BSMW - Expense Ratio Comparison
DIG has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than BSMW's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
DIG vs. BSMW - Dividend Comparison
DIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, less than BSMW's 3.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSMW Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF | 3.20% | 3.24% | 3.48% | 2.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DIG ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas | 1.49% | 2.62% | 3.13% | 0.61% | 1.33% | 2.24% | 3.18% | 2.72% | 2.30% | 1.76% | 1.09% | 1.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DIG and BSMW have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DIG has higher volatility (16.57%) compared to BSMW (0.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIG dropped -97.04% vs BSMW's -7.57%.
On 3-year performance, DIG leads with 24.00% vs 3.23% for BSMW. On fees, BSMW is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, BSMW has been the lower-risk option at 0.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DIG has performed better with a 24.00% return vs 3.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BSMW is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for DIG.
BSMW has the higher dividend yield at 3.20%, compared with 1.49% for DIG.
DIG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BSMW is Municipal Bonds. DIG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Oil & Gas Index (200%), while BSMW tracks Invesco BulletShares USD Municipal Bond 2032 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for DIG and 0.18% for BSMW.
DIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DIG and BSMW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer