PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DIEM vs. FLIN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DIEM vs. FLIN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIEM) and Franklin FTSE India ETF (FLIN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DIEM achieves a 32.78% return, which is significantly higher than FLIN's -11.92% return.


DIEM

1D
-1.37%
1M
12.08%
YTD
32.78%
6M
35.57%
1Y
60.54%
3Y*
28.35%
5Y*
11.49%
10Y*

FLIN

1D
-1.51%
1M
-2.58%
YTD
-11.92%
6M
-10.85%
1Y
-11.63%
3Y*
5.53%
5Y*
3.56%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DIEM vs. FLIN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
DIEM
Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF
32.78%30.81%12.29%15.41%-20.61%6.92%1.27%12.23%-9.53%
FLIN
Franklin FTSE India ETF
-11.92%2.40%10.33%20.58%-7.96%24.96%14.50%4.77%-6.70%

Correlation

The correlation between DIEM and FLIN is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2018

0.60

The correlation between DIEM and FLIN shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (3 years) to 0.60 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DIEM vs. FLIN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DIEM
FLIN

Technology

40.3%
8.4%

Financial Services

23.3%
27.2%

Consumer Cyclical

6.7%
12.0%

Energy

6.0%
9.5%

Communication Services

5.6%
4.6%

Industrials

4.7%
10.3%

Basic Materials

4.2%
9.2%

Utilities

4.1%
5.3%

Consumer Defensive

2.9%
5.8%

Real Estate

1.6%
1.3%

Healthcare

0.6%
6.5%

Technology

DIEM
40.3%
FLIN
8.4%

Financial Services

DIEM
23.3%
FLIN
27.2%

Consumer Cyclical

DIEM
6.7%
FLIN
12.0%

Energy

DIEM
6.0%
FLIN
9.5%

Communication Services

DIEM
5.6%
FLIN
4.6%

Industrials

DIEM
4.7%
FLIN
10.3%

Basic Materials

DIEM
4.2%
FLIN
9.2%

Utilities

DIEM
4.1%
FLIN
5.3%

Consumer Defensive

DIEM
2.9%
FLIN
5.8%

Real Estate

DIEM
1.6%
FLIN
1.3%

Healthcare

DIEM
0.6%
FLIN
6.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DIEM vs. FLIN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DIEM
DIEM Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
DIEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIEM Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
DIEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

FLIN
FLIN Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
FLIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLIN Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
FLIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLIN Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DIEM vs. FLIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIEM) and Franklin FTSE India ETF (FLIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DIEMFLINDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.35

-0.78

+4.13

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.26

-1.06

+5.31

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.62

0.88

+0.74

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.93

-0.62

+5.55

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

20.34

-1.54

+21.88

DIEM vs. FLIN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DIEM Sharpe Ratio is 3.35, which is higher than the FLIN Sharpe Ratio of -0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DIEM and FLIN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DIEMFLINDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.35

-0.78

+4.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.23

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.26

+0.28

Drawdowns

DIEM vs. FLIN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIEM drawdown since its inception was -38.61%, smaller than the maximum FLIN drawdown of -41.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIEM and FLIN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DIEMFLINDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.61%

-41.90%

+3.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.33%

-18.79%

+6.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.82%

-22.85%

+6.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.34%

-22.85%

-10.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.37%

-18.91%

+17.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.72%

-8.01%

-1.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.99%

7.57%

-4.58%

Volatility

DIEM vs. FLIN - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIEM) has a higher volatility of 8.52% compared to Franklin FTSE India ETF (FLIN) at 5.21%. This indicates that DIEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DIEMFLINDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.52%

5.21%

+3.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.91%

12.81%

+3.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.17%

14.92%

+3.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.93%

15.74%

+1.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.59%

20.45%

-2.86%

DIEM vs. FLIN - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DIEM and FLIN have an expense ratio of 0.19%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DIEM vs. FLIN - Dividend Comparison

DIEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.30%, more than FLIN's 0.64% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DIEM
Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF
2.30%2.99%4.92%4.45%6.31%4.06%2.75%5.98%3.87%2.61%0.35%
FLIN
Franklin FTSE India ETF
0.64%0.56%1.58%0.73%0.73%2.26%0.68%0.90%0.92%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DIEM and FLIN have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DIEM has higher volatility (8.52%) compared to FLIN (5.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIEM dropped -38.61% vs FLIN's -41.90%.

On 5-year performance, DIEM leads with 11.49% vs 3.56% for FLIN. Both ETFs have the same 0.19% expense ratio. On volatility, FLIN has been the lower-risk option at 5.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DIEM has performed better with a 11.49% return vs 3.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DIEM and FLIN have the same expense ratio: 0.19% per year.

DIEM has the higher dividend yield at 2.30%, compared with 0.64% for FLIN.

DIEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while FLIN is Asia Pacific Equities. DIEM tracks Morningstar Emerging Markets Dividend Enhanced Select Index, while FLIN tracks FTSE India RIC Capped Index.

DIEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.35 vs -0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DIEM and FLIN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer