DIEM vs. EMEQ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DIEM (Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF) and EMEQ (Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. DIEM is passively managed, while EMEQ is actively managed. Over the past year, DIEM returned 60.54% vs 166.45% for EMEQ. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DIEM charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for EMEQ.

Performance

DIEM vs. EMEQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIEM) and Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DIEM achieves a 32.78% return, which is significantly lower than EMEQ's 78.09% return.

DIEM

• 1D: -1.37%
• 1M: 12.08%
• YTD: 32.78%
• 6M: 35.57%
• 1Y: 60.54%
• 3Y*: 28.35%
• 5Y*: 11.49%
• 10Y*: —

EMEQ

• 1D: -1.28%
• 1M: 23.68%
• YTD: 78.09%
• 6M: 88.05%
• 1Y: 166.45%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DIEM vs. EMEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
DIEM Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF	32.78%	30.81%	1.41%
EMEQ Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF	78.09%	69.78%	-1.16%

Correlation

The correlation between DIEM and EMEQ is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2024	0.88

The correlation between DIEM and EMEQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

DIEM vs. EMEQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DIEM	EMEQ
Technology	40.3%	56.6%
Financial Services	23.3%	11.1%
Consumer Cyclical	6.7%	8.2%
Energy	6.0%	7.0%
Communication Services	5.6%	5.7%
Industrials	4.7%	5.8%
Basic Materials	4.2%	1.8%
Utilities	4.1%	-
Consumer Defensive	2.9%	2.9%
Real Estate	1.6%	-
Healthcare	0.6%	1.0%

Return for Risk

DIEM vs. EMEQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DIEM

DIEM Risk / Return Rank: 90
DIEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
DIEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
DIEM Omega Ratio Rank: 92
DIEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
DIEM Martin Ratio Rank: 89

EMEQ

EMEQ Risk / Return Rank: 96
EMEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
EMEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
EMEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 95
EMEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
EMEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DIEM vs. EMEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIEM) and Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DIEM	EMEQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.35	5.22	-1.87
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.26	5.25	-1.00
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.62	1.75	-0.13
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.93	9.35	-4.42
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	20.34	37.42	-17.08
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DIEM vs. EMEQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DIEM Sharpe Ratio is 3.35, which is lower than the EMEQ Sharpe Ratio of 5.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DIEM and EMEQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DIEM	EMEQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.35	5.22	-1.87
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.55	2.95	-2.40

Drawdowns

DIEM vs. EMEQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIEM drawdown since its inception was -38.61%, which is greater than EMEQ's maximum drawdown of -19.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIEM and EMEQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	DIEM	EMEQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.61%	-19.99%	-18.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.33%	-17.91%	+5.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.82%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.34%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.61%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.37%	-1.28%	-0.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.72%	-3.97%	-5.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.99%	4.47%	-1.48%

Volatility

DIEM vs. EMEQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIEM) is 8.52%, while Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ) has a volatility of 15.18%. This indicates that DIEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMEQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DIEM	EMEQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.52%	15.18%	-6.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.91%	28.51%	-12.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.17%	32.10%	-13.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.93%	29.97%	-13.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.59%	29.97%	-12.38%

DIEM vs. EMEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

DIEM has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than EMEQ's 0.86% expense ratio.

Dividends

DIEM vs. EMEQ - Dividend Comparison

DIEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.30%, more than EMEQ's 1.55% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
DIEM Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF	2.30%	2.99%	4.92%	4.45%	6.31%	4.06%	2.75%	5.98%	3.87%	2.61%	0.35%
EMEQ Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF	1.55%	2.76%	0.84%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DIEM and EMEQ in my portfolio?

DIEM and EMEQ have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DIEM or EMEQ?

EMEQ has higher volatility (15.18%) compared to DIEM (8.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIEM dropped -38.61% vs EMEQ's -19.99%.

Which ETF is better, DIEM or EMEQ?

On 1-year performance, EMEQ leads with 166.45% vs 60.54% for DIEM. On fees, DIEM is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, DIEM has been the lower-risk option at 8.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DIEM or EMEQ?

Over the 1-year period, EMEQ has performed better with a 166.45% return vs 60.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DIEM or EMEQ?

DIEM is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for EMEQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DIEM or EMEQ?

DIEM has the higher dividend yield at 2.30%, compared with 1.55% for EMEQ.

What is the main difference between DIEM and EMEQ?

They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Nomura. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for DIEM and 0.86% for EMEQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EMEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.22 vs 3.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.