DIEFX vs. FHLFX
DIEFX (Destinations International Equity Fund) and FHLFX (Fidelity Series International Index Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, DIEFX returned 6.68%/yr vs 8.85%/yr for FHLFX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DIEFX charges 1.16%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for FHLFX.
Performance
DIEFX vs. FHLFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DIEFX achieves a 16.96% return, which is significantly higher than FHLFX's 9.53% return.
DIEFX
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- 6.50%
- YTD
- 16.96%
- 6M
- 19.51%
- 1Y
- 32.48%
- 3Y*
- 18.58%
- 5Y*
- 6.68%
- 10Y*
- —
FHLFX
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 4.09%
- YTD
- 9.53%
- 6M
- 12.09%
- 1Y
- 22.51%
- 3Y*
- 17.18%
- 5Y*
- 8.85%
- 10Y*
- —
DIEFX vs. FHLFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIEFX Destinations International Equity Fund | 16.96% | 30.39% | 1.85% | 15.54% | -20.97% | 1.40% | 23.41% | 25.07% | -11.61% |
FHLFX Fidelity Series International Index Fund | 9.53% | 31.96% | 3.67% | 18.16% | -14.17% | 11.23% | 8.09% | 21.66% | -10.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between DIEFX and FHLFX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2018 | 0.92 |
The correlation between DIEFX and FHLFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DIEFX vs. FHLFX — Risk / Return Rank
DIEFX
FHLFX
DIEFX vs. FHLFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Destinations International Equity Fund (DIEFX) and Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DIEFX | FHLFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.27 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.81 | 1.91 | +0.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.00 | 7.17 | +3.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DIEFX | FHLFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.27 | 1.47 | +0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.56 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.53 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
DIEFX vs. FHLFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DIEFX drawdown since its inception was -34.96%, roughly equal to the maximum FHLFX drawdown of -33.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIEFX and FHLFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DIEFX | FHLFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.96% | -33.58% | -1.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.71% | -11.37% | -0.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.60% | -13.62% | +0.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.96% | -29.36% | -5.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.42% | +0.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.15% | -6.11% | -3.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.95% | 3.03% | -0.08% |
Volatility
DIEFX vs. FHLFX - Volatility Comparison
Destinations International Equity Fund (DIEFX) has a higher volatility of 5.08% compared to Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX) at 4.64%. This indicates that DIEFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FHLFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DIEFX | FHLFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.08% | 4.64% | +0.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.28% | 12.08% | +0.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.49% | 14.83% | -0.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.63% | 15.98% | -0.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.87% | 17.64% | -1.77% |
DIEFX vs. FHLFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DIEFX has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is higher than FHLFX's 0.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
DIEFX vs. FHLFX - Dividend Comparison
DIEFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.66%, more than FHLFX's 3.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIEFX Destinations International Equity Fund | 8.66% | 10.13% | 3.63% | 1.85% | 2.73% | 4.50% | 0.03% | 0.74% | 1.50% | 0.67% |
FHLFX Fidelity Series International Index Fund | 3.16% | 3.46% | 2.98% | 2.86% | 2.60% | 2.47% | 1.92% | 1.95% | 0.62% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DIEFX and FHLFX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DIEFX has higher volatility (5.08%) compared to FHLFX (4.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIEFX dropped -34.96% vs FHLFX's -33.58%.
DIEFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DIEFX and FHLFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer