DIBRX vs. EAIIX
Compare and contrast key facts about BNY Mellon International Bond Fund (DIBRX) and Eaton Vance Global Bond Fund (EAIIX).
DIBRX is managed by Dreyfus. It was launched on Dec 29, 2005. EAIIX is managed by Eaton Vance. It was launched on Jun 26, 2007.
Performance
DIBRX vs. EAIIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DIBRX vs. EAIIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIBRX BNY Mellon International Bond Fund | -2.46% | 8.51% | -3.14% | 5.70% | -16.81% | -6.80% | 8.38% | 5.16% | -5.80% | 12.58% |
EAIIX Eaton Vance Global Bond Fund | 1.22% | 13.67% | -2.81% | 8.45% | -11.29% | -5.71% | 9.33% | 6.09% | -2.67% | 10.58% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DIBRX achieves a -2.46% return, which is significantly lower than EAIIX's 1.22% return. Over the past 10 years, DIBRX has underperformed EAIIX with an annualized return of -0.27%, while EAIIX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.48% annualized return.
DIBRX
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- -3.21%
- YTD
- -2.46%
- 6M
- -3.00%
- 1Y
- 2.91%
- 3Y*
- 2.00%
- 5Y*
- -2.45%
- 10Y*
- -0.27%
EAIIX
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -1.24%
- YTD
- 1.22%
- 6M
- 3.72%
- 1Y
- 11.99%
- 3Y*
- 5.46%
- 5Y*
- 1.01%
- 10Y*
- 2.48%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DIBRX vs. EAIIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DIBRX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than EAIIX's 1.02% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DIBRX vs. EAIIX — Risk / Return Rank
DIBRX
EAIIX
DIBRX vs. EAIIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon International Bond Fund (DIBRX) and Eaton Vance Global Bond Fund (EAIIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DIBRX | EAIIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.40 | 2.52 | -2.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.65 | 3.96 | -3.31 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.59 | -0.52 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.56 | 5.16 | -4.60 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.54 | 17.55 | -16.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DIBRX | EAIIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 | 2.52 | -2.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.34 | 0.15 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.04 | 0.45 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.53 | -0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between DIBRX and EAIIX is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
DIBRX vs. EAIIX - Dividend Comparison
DIBRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%, less than EAIIX's 8.61% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIBRX BNY Mellon International Bond Fund | 2.55% | 2.48% | 2.34% | 0.00% | 0.58% | 1.90% | 2.16% | 0.00% | 3.64% | 3.81% | 0.61% | 5.14% |
EAIIX Eaton Vance Global Bond Fund | 8.61% | 7.44% | 4.80% | 4.42% | 4.54% | 5.37% | 6.13% | 5.69% | 4.70% | 4.43% | 5.53% | 5.89% |
Drawdowns
DIBRX vs. EAIIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DIBRX drawdown since its inception was -30.62%, which is greater than EAIIX's maximum drawdown of -25.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIBRX and EAIIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DIBRX | EAIIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.62% | -25.32% | -5.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.21% | -2.33% | -2.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.69% | -24.13% | -4.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.62% | -25.32% | -5.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.59% | -2.03% | -14.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.13% | -5.09% | -2.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.89% | 0.68% | +1.21% |
Volatility
DIBRX vs. EAIIX - Volatility Comparison
BNY Mellon International Bond Fund (DIBRX) has a higher volatility of 2.66% compared to Eaton Vance Global Bond Fund (EAIIX) at 1.37%. This indicates that DIBRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EAIIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DIBRX | EAIIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.66% | 1.37% | +1.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.30% | 2.12% | +2.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.51% | 4.84% | +2.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.35% | 6.56% | +0.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.13% | 5.50% | +1.63% |