DIA vs. MAGS
DIA (State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust) and MAGS (Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DIA is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Industrial Average, while MAGS is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. DIA is passively managed, while MAGS is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, DIA returned 16.36%/yr vs 33.16%/yr for MAGS. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DIA charges 0.16%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for MAGS.
Performance
DIA vs. MAGS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DIA achieves a 6.40% return, which is significantly higher than MAGS's 0.86% return.
DIA
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 2.63%
- YTD
- 6.40%
- 6M
- 7.17%
- 1Y
- 20.62%
- 3Y*
- 16.36%
- 5Y*
- 9.98%
- 10Y*
- 13.18%
MAGS
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -4.44%
- YTD
- 0.86%
- 6M
- 0.73%
- 1Y
- 28.10%
- 3Y*
- 33.16%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DIA vs. MAGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DIA State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust | 6.40% | 14.71% | 14.82% | 13.52% |
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | 0.86% | 22.99% | 63.97% | 37.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between DIA and MAGS is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2023 | 0.49 |
The correlation between DIA and MAGS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.
DIA vs. MAGS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DIA
MAGS
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Technology
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
DIA
MAGS
-
Industrials
DIA
MAGS
-
Technology
DIA
MAGS
Healthcare
DIA
MAGS
-
Consumer Cyclical
DIA
MAGS
Consumer Defensive
DIA
MAGS
-
Basic Materials
DIA
MAGS
-
Energy
DIA
MAGS
-
Communication Services
DIA
MAGS
Real Estate
DIA
-
MAGS
-
Utilities
DIA
-
MAGS
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DIA vs. MAGS — Risk / Return Rank
DIA
MAGS
DIA vs. MAGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DIA | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.24 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.12 | 1.52 | +0.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.20 | 5.22 | +2.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DIA | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.69 | 1.40 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 1.49 | -1.00 |
Drawdowns
DIA vs. MAGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DIA drawdown since its inception was -51.87%, which is greater than MAGS's maximum drawdown of -29.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIA and MAGS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DIA | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.87% | -29.91% | -21.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.76% | -18.62% | +8.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.95% | -29.91% | +13.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.76% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.51% | -6.22% | +4.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.14% | -4.70% | -2.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.52% | 5.40% | -2.88% |
Volatility
DIA vs. MAGS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA) is 3.39%, while Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) has a volatility of 5.89%. This indicates that DIA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MAGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DIA | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.39% | 5.89% | -2.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.49% | 14.84% | -5.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.26% | 20.22% | -7.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.81% | 25.99% | -11.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.55% | 25.99% | -8.44% |
DIA vs. MAGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
DIA has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than MAGS's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
DIA vs. MAGS - Dividend Comparison
DIA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, less than MAGS's 1.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIA State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust | 1.38% | 1.43% | 1.61% | 1.81% | 1.91% | 1.58% | 1.87% | 1.85% | 2.24% | 1.97% | 2.26% | 2.33% |
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | 1.47% | 1.48% | 0.81% | 0.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DIA and MAGS have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MAGS has higher volatility (5.89%) compared to DIA (3.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIA dropped -51.87% vs MAGS's -29.91%.
On 3-year performance, MAGS leads with 33.16% vs 16.36% for DIA. On fees, DIA is cheaper at 0.16% per year. On volatility, DIA has been the lower-risk option at 3.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, MAGS has performed better with a 33.16% return vs 16.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DIA is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for MAGS.
MAGS has the higher dividend yield at 1.47%, compared with 1.38% for DIA.
DIA is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while MAGS is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for DIA and 0.29% for MAGS.
DIA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DIA and MAGS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer