PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DIA vs. FLOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DIA vs. FLOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA) and iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DIA achieves a 7.27% return, which is significantly higher than FLOT's 1.99% return. Over the past 10 years, DIA has outperformed FLOT with an annualized return of 13.40%, while FLOT has yielded a comparatively lower 3.04% annualized return.


DIA

1D
0.73%
1M
3.26%
YTD
7.27%
6M
6.43%
1Y
21.01%
3Y*
16.29%
5Y*
10.14%
10Y*
13.40%

FLOT

1D
0.02%
1M
0.47%
YTD
1.99%
6M
2.23%
1Y
4.87%
3Y*
5.66%
5Y*
4.22%
10Y*
3.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DIA vs. FLOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DIA
State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust
7.27%14.71%14.82%16.02%-7.02%20.83%9.59%24.70%-3.74%28.08%
FLOT
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF
1.99%4.91%6.53%6.43%1.28%0.45%0.87%3.97%1.48%1.65%

Correlation

The correlation between DIA and FLOT is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2011

0.12

The correlation between DIA and FLOT shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (all time) to 0.30 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DIA vs. FLOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DIA
DIA Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
DIA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIA Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
DIA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIA Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

FLOT
FLOT Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
FLOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLOT Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
FLOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLOT Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DIA vs. FLOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA) and iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DIAFLOTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-9.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

3.23

-1.93

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

11.32

-9.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.35

105.27

-96.92

DIA vs. FLOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DIA Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is lower than the FLOT Sharpe Ratio of 6.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DIA and FLOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DIA vs. FLOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIA drawdown since its inception was -51.87%, which is greater than FLOT's maximum drawdown of -13.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIA and FLOT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DIAFLOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.87%

-13.54%

-38.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.76%

-0.43%

-9.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.95%

-1.57%

-14.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.76%

-2.36%

-18.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.70%

-13.54%

-23.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.70%

0.00%

-0.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.14%

-0.21%

-6.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.53%

0.05%

+2.48%

Volatility

DIA vs. FLOT - Volatility Comparison

State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA) has a higher volatility of 4.32% compared to iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF (FLOT) at 0.21%. This indicates that DIA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DIAFLOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.32%

0.21%

+4.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.78%

0.63%

+9.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.52%

0.75%

+11.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.85%

1.77%

+13.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.56%

4.15%

+13.41%

DIA vs. FLOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

DIA has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is higher than FLOT's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DIA vs. FLOT - Dividend Comparison

DIA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, less than FLOT's 4.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DIA
State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust
1.37%1.43%1.61%1.81%1.91%1.58%1.87%1.85%2.24%1.97%2.26%2.33%
FLOT
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF
4.53%4.84%5.82%5.66%2.06%0.43%1.25%2.78%2.41%1.46%0.97%0.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


DIA and FLOT have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DIA has higher volatility (4.32%) compared to FLOT (0.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIA dropped -51.87% vs FLOT's -13.54%.

On 10-year performance, DIA leads with 13.40% vs 3.04% for FLOT. On fees, FLOT is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FLOT has been the lower-risk option at 0.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DIA has performed better with a 13.40% return vs 3.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLOT is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.16% for DIA.

FLOT has the higher dividend yield at 4.53%, compared with 1.37% for DIA.

DIA is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FLOT is Ultrashort Bond. DIA tracks Dow Jones Industrial Average, while FLOT tracks Bloomberg US Floating Rate Note < 5 Years Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for DIA and 0.15% for FLOT.

FLOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.56 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DIA and FLOT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer