DIA vs. AFOS
DIA (State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust) and AFOS (ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DIA charges 0.16%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for AFOS.
Performance
DIA vs. AFOS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DIA achieves a 6.26% return, which is significantly lower than AFOS's 32.04% return.
DIA
- 1D
- -1.13%
- 1M
- 3.88%
- YTD
- 6.26%
- 6M
- 6.75%
- 1Y
- 21.13%
- 3Y*
- 16.45%
- 5Y*
- 9.76%
- 10Y*
- 13.21%
AFOS
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 8.94%
- YTD
- 32.04%
- 6M
- 37.37%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DIA vs. AFOS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DIA State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust | 6.26% | 11.60% |
AFOS ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF | 32.04% | 36.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between DIA and AFOS is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025 | 0.63 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DIA vs. AFOS — Risk / Return Rank
DIA
AFOS
DIA vs. AFOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DIA | AFOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.18 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.42 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DIA | AFOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.76 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 4.35 | -3.86 |
Drawdowns
DIA vs. AFOS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DIA drawdown since its inception was -51.87%, which is greater than AFOS's maximum drawdown of -11.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIA and AFOS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DIA | AFOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.87% | -11.52% | -40.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.76% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.95% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.76% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.13% | -0.29% | -0.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.14% | -1.37% | -5.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.52% | — | — |
Volatility
DIA vs. AFOS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DIA | AFOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.97% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.28% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.10% | 20.19% | -8.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.78% | 20.19% | -5.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.53% | 20.19% | -2.66% |
DIA vs. AFOS - Expense Ratio Comparison
DIA has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than AFOS's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
DIA vs. AFOS - Dividend Comparison
DIA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, more than AFOS's 0.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFOS ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF | 0.22% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DIA State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust | 1.38% | 1.43% | 1.61% | 1.81% | 1.91% | 1.58% | 1.87% | 1.85% | 2.24% | 1.97% | 2.26% | 2.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DIA and AFOS have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DIA is cheaper at 0.16% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DIA is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for AFOS.
DIA has the higher dividend yield at 1.38%, compared with 0.22% for AFOS.
They also come from different issuers: State Street and ARS Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for DIA and 0.45% for AFOS.
Find the right allocation for DIA and AFOS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer