DHSCX vs. BSCMX
DHSCX (Diamond Hill Small Cap Fund) and BSCMX (Brandes Small Cap Value Fund) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, DHSCX returned 13.39%/yr vs 17.32%/yr for BSCMX. Their correlation of 0.87 means they have usually moved in the same direction. DHSCX charges 1.26%/yr vs 0.91%/yr for BSCMX.
Performance
DHSCX vs. BSCMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DHSCX achieves a 27.58% return, which is significantly higher than BSCMX's 23.52% return.
DHSCX
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -0.51%
- 6M
- 18.27%
- YTD
- 27.58%
- 1Y
- 42.16%
- 3Y*
- 19.16%
- 5Y*
- 13.39%
- 10Y*
- 10.73%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.16%
BSCMX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.28%
- 6M
- 12.26%
- YTD
- 23.52%
- 1Y
- 46.32%
- 3Y*
- 25.72%
- 5Y*
- 17.32%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.86%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
DHSCX vs. BSCMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DHSCX Diamond Hill Small Cap Fund | 27.58% | 11.48% | 12.75% | 23.99% | -15.11% | 32.30% | -0.54% | 21.45% | -15.73% |
BSCMX Brandes Small Cap Value Fund | 23.52% | 23.51% | 24.77% | 22.75% | -7.89% | 27.61% | 20.38% | 12.82% | -12.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between DHSCX and BSCMX is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2018 | 0.87 |
The correlation between DHSCX and BSCMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DHSCX vs. BSCMX — Risk / Return Rank
DHSCX
BSCMX
DHSCX vs. BSCMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Diamond Hill Small Cap Fund (DHSCX) and Brandes Small Cap Value Fund (BSCMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DHSCX | BSCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.43 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.60 | 4.57 | -0.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.79 | 16.48 | -4.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DHSCX vs. BSCMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DHSCX drawdown since its inception was -53.15%, which is greater than BSCMX's maximum drawdown of -38.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DHSCX and BSCMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DHSCX | BSCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.15% | -38.12% | -15.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.02% | -9.65% | -1.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.41% | -22.34% | -6.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.41% | -22.34% | -6.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.19% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.65% | -2.18% | +0.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.27% | -5.94% | -2.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.36% | 2.67% | +0.69% |
Volatility
DHSCX vs. BSCMX - Volatility Comparison
Diamond Hill Small Cap Fund (DHSCX) has a higher volatility of 5.69% compared to Brandes Small Cap Value Fund (BSCMX) at 4.13%. This indicates that DHSCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSCMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DHSCX | BSCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.69% | 4.13% | +1.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.06% | 11.67% | +2.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.86% | 17.25% | +2.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.48% | 17.94% | +3.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.24% | 20.51% | +1.73% |
DHSCX vs. BSCMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DHSCX has a 1.26% expense ratio, which is higher than BSCMX's 0.91% expense ratio.
Dividends
DHSCX vs. BSCMX - Dividend Comparison
DHSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.55%, more than BSCMX's 3.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCMX Brandes Small Cap Value Fund | 3.76% | 4.54% | 2.31% | 3.50% | 2.93% | 4.38% | 1.76% | 1.11% | 9.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DHSCX Diamond Hill Small Cap Fund | 4.55% | 5.80% | 16.10% | 30.73% | 18.17% | 17.43% | 0.32% | 6.94% | 10.29% | 6.68% | 2.50% | 1.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DHSCX and BSCMX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DHSCX has higher volatility (5.69%) compared to BSCMX (4.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DHSCX dropped -53.15% vs BSCMX's -38.12%.
BSCMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DHSCX and BSCMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer