DHSCX vs. BSCMX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DHSCX (Diamond Hill Small Cap Fund) and BSCMX (Brandes Small Cap Value Fund) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, DHSCX returned 10.16%/yr vs 15.52%/yr for BSCMX. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DHSCX charges 1.26%/yr vs 0.91%/yr for BSCMX.

Performance

DHSCX vs. BSCMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Diamond Hill Small Cap Fund (DHSCX) and Brandes Small Cap Value Fund (BSCMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with DHSCX having a 15.54% return and BSCMX slightly higher at 15.67%.

DHSCX

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: 3.20%
• YTD: 15.54%
• 6M: 18.08%
• 1Y: 35.64%
• 3Y*: 18.76%
• 5Y*: 10.16%
• 10Y*: 9.71%

BSCMX

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: 1.80%
• YTD: 15.67%
• 6M: 17.50%
• 1Y: 41.78%
• 3Y*: 25.45%
• 5Y*: 15.52%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DHSCX vs. BSCMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
DHSCX Diamond Hill Small Cap Fund	15.54%	11.48%	12.75%	23.99%	-15.11%	32.30%	-0.54%	21.45%	-15.63%
BSCMX Brandes Small Cap Value Fund	15.67%	23.51%	24.77%	22.75%	-7.89%	27.61%	20.38%	12.82%	-12.23%

Correlation

The correlation between DHSCX and BSCMX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 9, 2018	0.87

The correlation between DHSCX and BSCMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

DHSCX vs. BSCMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DHSCX

DHSCX Risk / Return Rank: 52
DHSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
DHSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
DHSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 39
DHSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
DHSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 56

BSCMX

BSCMX Risk / Return Rank: 77
BSCMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
BSCMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
BSCMX Omega Ratio Rank: 58
BSCMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
BSCMX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DHSCX vs. BSCMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Diamond Hill Small Cap Fund (DHSCX) and Brandes Small Cap Value Fund (BSCMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DHSCX	BSCMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.97	2.55	-0.59
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.82	3.63	-0.80
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.43	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.48	4.59	-1.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.24	15.58	-4.34
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DHSCX vs. BSCMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DHSCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is comparable to the BSCMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DHSCX and BSCMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DHSCX	BSCMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.97	2.55	-0.59
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.48	0.87	-0.40
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.44	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.48	0.70	-0.22

Drawdowns

DHSCX vs. BSCMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DHSCX drawdown since its inception was -53.15%, which is greater than BSCMX's maximum drawdown of -38.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DHSCX and BSCMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	DHSCX	BSCMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.15%	-38.12%	-15.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.02%	-9.65%	-1.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.41%	-22.34%	-6.07%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.41%	-22.34%	-6.07%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.19%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.60%	-1.28%	+0.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.32%	-6.04%	-2.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.40%	2.83%	+0.57%

Volatility

DHSCX vs. BSCMX - Volatility Comparison

Diamond Hill Small Cap Fund (DHSCX) has a higher volatility of 5.14% compared to Brandes Small Cap Value Fund (BSCMX) at 4.57%. This indicates that DHSCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSCMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DHSCX	BSCMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.14%	4.57%	+0.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.22%	11.66%	+1.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.51%	17.35%	+2.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.48%	17.89%	+3.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.21%	20.60%	+1.61%

DHSCX vs. BSCMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DHSCX has a 1.26% expense ratio, which is higher than BSCMX's 0.91% expense ratio.

Dividends

DHSCX vs. BSCMX - Dividend Comparison

DHSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.02%, more than BSCMX's 3.93% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BSCMX Brandes Small Cap Value Fund	3.93%	4.54%	2.31%	3.50%	2.93%	4.38%	1.76%	1.11%	9.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
DHSCX Diamond Hill Small Cap Fund	5.02%	5.80%	16.10%	30.73%	18.17%	17.43%	0.32%	6.94%	10.29%	6.68%	2.50%	1.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DHSCX and BSCMX in my portfolio?

DHSCX and BSCMX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DHSCX or BSCMX?

DHSCX has higher volatility (5.14%) compared to BSCMX (4.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DHSCX dropped -53.15% vs BSCMX's -38.12%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BSCMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.