PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DHS vs. MOAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DHS vs. MOAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS) and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DHS achieves a 12.81% return, which is significantly higher than MOAT's -1.06% return. Over the past 10 years, DHS has underperformed MOAT with an annualized return of 9.75%, while MOAT has yielded a comparatively higher 13.35% annualized return.


DHS

1D
0.56%
1M
2.48%
YTD
12.81%
6M
12.76%
1Y
22.47%
3Y*
16.75%
5Y*
11.12%
10Y*
9.75%

MOAT

1D
1.16%
1M
2.54%
YTD
-1.06%
6M
-2.38%
1Y
12.21%
3Y*
10.67%
5Y*
7.69%
10Y*
13.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DHS vs. MOAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DHS
WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund
12.81%12.87%18.02%-0.19%7.97%23.20%-5.70%22.59%-7.41%11.69%
MOAT
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
-1.06%13.20%10.73%31.89%-13.66%24.12%14.84%34.79%-1.28%23.18%

Correlation

The correlation between DHS and MOAT is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2012

0.76

Over the past year, the correlation between DHS and MOAT has dropped to 0.55 - well below their long-term average of 0.76, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

DHS vs. MOAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DHS
MOAT

Financial Services

22.3%
6.7%

Consumer Defensive

18.7%
17.5%

Healthcare

14.5%
16.0%

Energy

9.4%

-

Communication Services

9.3%
2.4%

Utilities

9.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

5.0%
10.3%

Industrials

4.1%
13.5%

Technology

3.7%
32.8%

Real Estate

2.8%
0.8%

Basic Materials

1.2%

-

Financial Services

DHS
22.3%
MOAT
6.7%

Consumer Defensive

DHS
18.7%
MOAT
17.5%

Healthcare

DHS
14.5%
MOAT
16.0%

Energy

DHS
9.4%
MOAT

-

Communication Services

DHS
9.3%
MOAT
2.4%

Utilities

DHS
9.0%
MOAT

-

Consumer Cyclical

DHS
5.0%
MOAT
10.3%

Industrials

DHS
4.1%
MOAT
13.5%

Technology

DHS
3.7%
MOAT
32.8%

Real Estate

DHS
2.8%
MOAT
0.8%

Basic Materials

DHS
1.2%
MOAT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DHS vs. MOAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DHS
DHS Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
DHS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DHS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
DHS Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
DHS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
DHS Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

MOAT
MOAT Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
MOAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOAT Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
MOAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOAT Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DHS vs. MOAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS) and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DHSMOATDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.15

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.58

0.99

+2.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.09

3.02

+10.07

DHS vs. MOAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DHS Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is higher than the MOAT Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DHS and MOAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DHS vs. MOAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DHS drawdown since its inception was -67.25%, which is greater than MOAT's maximum drawdown of -33.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DHS and MOAT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DHSMOATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.25%

-33.31%

-33.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.30%

-12.43%

+6.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.87%

-21.44%

+9.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.28%

-23.96%

+8.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.35%

-33.31%

-4.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.00%

-4.84%

+4.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.54%

-3.83%

-5.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.72%

4.05%

-2.33%

Volatility

DHS vs. MOAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS) is 3.07%, while VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) has a volatility of 4.16%. This indicates that DHS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MOAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DHSMOATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.07%

4.16%

-1.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.35%

10.04%

-2.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.02%

13.94%

-3.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.90%

18.21%

-4.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.08%

18.69%

-2.61%

DHS vs. MOAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

DHS has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than MOAT's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

DHS vs. MOAT - Dividend Comparison

DHS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, more than MOAT's 1.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DHS
WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund
3.27%3.32%3.66%4.31%3.42%3.29%4.14%3.69%3.76%3.00%3.25%3.53%
MOAT
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
1.37%1.36%1.37%0.86%1.25%1.08%1.46%1.31%1.79%1.07%1.17%2.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


DHS and MOAT have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MOAT has higher volatility (4.16%) compared to DHS (3.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DHS dropped -67.25% vs MOAT's -33.31%.

On 10-year performance, MOAT leads with 13.35% vs 9.75% for DHS. On fees, DHS is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, DHS has been the lower-risk option at 3.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, MOAT has performed better with a 13.35% return vs 9.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DHS is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for MOAT.

DHS has the higher dividend yield at 3.27%, compared with 1.37% for MOAT.

DHS is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while MOAT is Large Cap Blend Equities. DHS tracks WisdomTree U.S. High Dividend Index, while MOAT tracks Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for DHS and 0.47% for MOAT.

DHS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DHS and MOAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer