PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DHS vs. GBTC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DHS vs. GBTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS) and Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF (GBTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DHS achieves a 12.81% return, which is significantly higher than GBTC's -27.85% return. Over the past 10 years, DHS has underperformed GBTC with an annualized return of 9.75%, while GBTC has yielded a comparatively higher 46.15% annualized return.


DHS

1D
0.56%
1M
2.48%
YTD
12.81%
6M
12.76%
1Y
22.47%
3Y*
16.75%
5Y*
11.12%
10Y*
9.75%

GBTC

1D
2.71%
1M
-21.45%
YTD
-27.85%
6M
-31.30%
1Y
-42.50%
3Y*
55.49%
5Y*
9.89%
10Y*
46.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DHS vs. GBTC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DHS
WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund
12.81%12.87%18.02%-0.19%7.97%23.20%-5.70%22.59%-7.41%11.69%
GBTC
Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF
-27.85%-7.65%113.81%317.61%-75.80%7.03%290.72%106.56%-82.10%1,787.72%

Correlation

The correlation between DHS and GBTC is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2015

0.15

The correlation between DHS and GBTC shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (1 year) to 0.23 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DHS vs. GBTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DHS
DHS Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
DHS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DHS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
DHS Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
DHS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
DHS Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

GBTC
GBTC Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
GBTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBTC Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
GBTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBTC Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DHS vs. GBTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS) and Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF (GBTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DHSGBTCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

0.84

+0.54

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.58

-0.81

+4.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.09

-1.43

+14.53

DHS vs. GBTC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DHS Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is higher than the GBTC Sharpe Ratio of -0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DHS and GBTC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DHS vs. GBTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DHS drawdown since its inception was -67.25%, smaller than the maximum GBTC drawdown of -89.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DHS and GBTC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DHSGBTCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.25%

-89.91%

+22.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.30%

-52.45%

+46.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.87%

-52.45%

+40.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.28%

-85.42%

+70.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.35%

-89.91%

+52.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.00%

-49.89%

+49.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.54%

-43.43%

+33.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.72%

29.68%

-27.96%

Volatility

DHS vs. GBTC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS) is 3.07%, while Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF (GBTC) has a volatility of 11.92%. This indicates that DHS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GBTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DHSGBTCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.07%

11.92%

-8.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.35%

34.41%

-27.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.02%

44.01%

-33.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.90%

62.27%

-48.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.08%

82.18%

-66.10%

DHS vs. GBTC - Expense Ratio Comparison

DHS has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than GBTC's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

DHS vs. GBTC - Dividend Comparison

DHS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, while GBTC has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DHS
WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund
3.27%3.32%3.66%4.31%3.42%3.29%4.14%3.69%3.76%3.00%3.25%3.53%
GBTC
Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%5.61%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DHS and GBTC have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GBTC has higher volatility (11.92%) compared to DHS (3.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DHS dropped -67.25% vs GBTC's -89.91%.

On 10-year performance, GBTC leads with 46.15% vs 9.75% for DHS. On fees, DHS is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, DHS has been the lower-risk option at 3.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GBTC has performed better with a 46.15% return vs 9.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DHS is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for GBTC.

DHS has the higher dividend yield at 3.27%, compared with 0.00% for GBTC.

DHS is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while GBTC is Cryptocurrency. DHS tracks WisdomTree U.S. High Dividend Index, while GBTC tracks CoinDesk Bitcoin Benchmark Rate Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Grayscale. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for DHS and 1.50% for GBTC.

DHS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs -0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DHS and GBTC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer