PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DHS.L vs. GGRP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DHS.L vs. GGRP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in WisdomTree US High Dividend UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (DHS.L) and WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD (GGRP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DHS.L achieves a 12.15% return, which is significantly higher than GGRP.L's 5.78% return.


DHS.L

1D
-0.35%
1M
1.99%
6M
8.98%
YTD
12.15%
1Y
21.91%
3Y*
16.07%
5Y*
12.35%
10Y*
9.13%

GGRP.L

1D
-0.33%
1M
-0.13%
6M
4.56%
YTD
5.78%
1Y
14.78%
3Y*
11.12%
5Y*
8.46%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DHS.L vs. GGRP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DHS.L
WisdomTree US High Dividend UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
12.15%4.77%20.38%-4.02%19.92%25.61%-7.64%18.85%-2.86%1.32%
GGRP.L
WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD
5.78%8.49%11.07%11.60%-3.21%20.97%11.56%28.30%-5.39%17.37%

Correlation

The correlation between DHS.L and GGRP.L is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2016

0.72

Over the past year, the correlation between DHS.L and GGRP.L has dropped to 0.52 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DHS.L vs. GGRP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DHS.L
DHS.L Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
DHS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DHS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
DHS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
DHS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
DHS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

GGRP.L
GGRP.L Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
GGRP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGRP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGRP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
GGRP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGRP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DHS.L vs. GGRP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree US High Dividend UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (DHS.L) and WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD (GGRP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DHS.LGGRP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.27

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.58

1.71

+1.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.31

6.62

+5.69

DHS.L vs. GGRP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DHS.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is higher than the GGRP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DHS.L and GGRP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DHS.L vs. GGRP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DHS.L drawdown since its inception was -38.98%, which is greater than GGRP.L's maximum drawdown of -22.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DHS.L and GGRP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DHS.LGGRP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.98%

-22.60%

-16.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.40%

-8.59%

+2.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.50%

-16.25%

-1.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.39%

-16.25%

-2.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.32%

-1.04%

-0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.19%

-3.86%

-5.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.86%

2.23%

-0.37%

Volatility

DHS.L vs. GGRP.L - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree US High Dividend UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (DHS.L) has a higher volatility of 2.57% compared to WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD (GGRP.L) at 2.32%. This indicates that DHS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GGRP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DHS.LGGRP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.57%

2.32%

+0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.13%

8.29%

-0.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.53%

10.24%

+0.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.84%

12.04%

+1.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.89%

14.83%

+0.06%

DHS.L vs. GGRP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

DHS.L has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than GGRP.L's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

DHS.L vs. GGRP.L - Dividend Comparison

DHS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.63%, more than GGRP.L's 1.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DHS.L
WisdomTree US High Dividend UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
2.63%2.89%5.19%5.19%2.83%2.87%5.63%4.86%3.06%2.70%2.51%2.46%
GGRP.L
WisdomTree Global Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD
1.19%1.23%1.61%1.84%2.42%1.60%0.84%0.78%2.14%1.42%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DHS.L and GGRP.L have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DHS.L is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DHS.L is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for GGRP.L.

DHS.L is categorized as Dividend, while GGRP.L is Global Equities. DHS.L tracks WisdomTree US High Dividend UCITS Index, while GGRP.L tracks WisdomTree Global Developed Quality Dividend Growth. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for DHS.L and 0.38% for GGRP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DHS.L and GGRP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer