DHS.L vs. DGRA.L
DHS.L (WisdomTree US High Dividend UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and DGRA.L (WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - DHS.L is a Dividend fund tracking the WisdomTree US High Dividend UCITS Index, while DGRA.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth UCITS Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DHS.L returned 9.13%/yr vs 12.96%/yr for DGRA.L. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DHS.L charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for DGRA.L.
Performance
DHS.L vs. DGRA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
DHS.L is traded in GBp, while DGRA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the DGRA.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DHS.L achieves a 12.15% return, which is significantly higher than DGRA.L's 6.57% return. Over the past 10 years, DHS.L has underperformed DGRA.L with an annualized return of 9.13%, while DGRA.L has yielded a comparatively higher 12.96% annualized return.
DHS.L
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- 1.99%
- 6M
- 8.98%
- YTD
- 12.15%
- 1Y
- 21.91%
- 3Y*
- 16.07%
- 5Y*
- 12.35%
- 10Y*
- 9.13%
DGRA.L
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- -0.38%
- 6M
- 5.28%
- YTD
- 6.57%
- 1Y
- 14.30%
- 3Y*
- 13.58%
- 5Y*
- 11.70%
- 10Y*
- 12.96%
DHS.L vs. DGRA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DHS.L WisdomTree US High Dividend UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 12.15% | 4.77% | 20.38% | -4.02% | 19.92% | 25.61% | -7.64% | 18.85% | -2.86% | 1.32% |
DGRA.L WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF USD Acc | 6.57% | 5.03% | 20.29% | 12.77% | 2.58% | 26.46% | 9.27% | 23.93% | -1.03% | 15.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between DHS.L and DGRA.L is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2016 | 0.69 |
Over the past year, the correlation between DHS.L and DGRA.L has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DHS.L vs. DGRA.L — Risk / Return Rank
DHS.L
DGRA.L
DHS.L vs. DGRA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree US High Dividend UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (DHS.L) and WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF USD Acc (DGRA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DHS.L | DGRA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.23 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.58 | 2.56 | +1.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.31 | 8.22 | +4.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DHS.L vs. DGRA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DHS.L drawdown since its inception was -38.98%, which is greater than DGRA.L's maximum drawdown of -23.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DHS.L and DGRA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DHS.L | DGRA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.98% | -23.29% | -15.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.40% | -5.57% | -0.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.50% | -18.01% | +0.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.39% | -18.01% | -0.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.93% | -23.29% | -5.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.32% | -1.22% | -0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.19% | -2.99% | -6.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.86% | 1.73% | +0.13% |
Volatility
DHS.L vs. DGRA.L - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree US High Dividend UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (DHS.L) and WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF USD Acc (DGRA.L) have volatilities of 2.57% and 2.59%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DHS.L | DGRA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.57% | 2.59% | -0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.13% | 8.24% | -0.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.53% | 11.30% | -0.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.84% | 14.05% | -0.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.89% | 15.45% | -0.56% |
DHS.L vs. DGRA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
DHS.L has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than DGRA.L's 0.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
DHS.L vs. DGRA.L - Dividend Comparison
DHS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.63%, while DGRA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRA.L WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF USD Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DHS.L WisdomTree US High Dividend UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 2.63% | 2.89% | 5.19% | 5.19% | 2.83% | 2.87% | 5.63% | 4.86% | 3.06% | 2.70% | 2.51% | 2.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DHS.L and DGRA.L have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DHS.L is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DHS.L is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for DGRA.L.
DHS.L is categorized as Dividend, while DGRA.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. DHS.L tracks WisdomTree US High Dividend UCITS Index, while DGRA.L tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth UCITS Index. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for DHS.L and 0.33% for DGRA.L.
Find the right allocation for DHS.L and DGRA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer