DHS.L vs. DEMD.L
DHS.L (WisdomTree US High Dividend UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and DEMD.L (WisdomTree Emerging Markets High Dividend UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - DHS.L is a Dividend fund tracking the WisdomTree US High Dividend UCITS Index, while DEMD.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree Emerging Markets High Dividend UCITS Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DHS.L returned 9.13%/yr vs 8.74%/yr for DEMD.L. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DHS.L charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for DEMD.L.
Performance
DHS.L vs. DEMD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
DHS.L is traded in GBp, while DEMD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the DEMD.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DHS.L achieves a 12.15% return, which is significantly lower than DEMD.L's 16.34% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DHS.L having a 9.13% annualized return and DEMD.L not far behind at 8.74%.
DHS.L
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- 1.99%
- 6M
- 8.98%
- YTD
- 12.15%
- 1Y
- 21.91%
- 3Y*
- 16.07%
- 5Y*
- 12.35%
- 10Y*
- 9.13%
DEMD.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -4.50%
- 6M
- 13.81%
- YTD
- 16.34%
- 1Y
- 20.79%
- 3Y*
- 15.48%
- 5Y*
- 10.55%
- 10Y*
- 8.74%
DHS.L vs. DEMD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DHS.L WisdomTree US High Dividend UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 12.15% | 4.77% | 20.38% | -4.02% | 19.92% | 25.61% | -7.64% | 18.85% | -2.86% | 1.32% |
DEMD.L WisdomTree Emerging Markets High Dividend UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 16.34% | 12.30% | 7.10% | 15.11% | -2.38% | 14.43% | -8.90% | 13.90% | -2.02% | 14.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between DHS.L and DEMD.L is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2014 | 0.48 |
Over the past year, the correlation between DHS.L and DEMD.L has dropped to 0.16 - well below their long-term average of 0.48, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DHS.L vs. DEMD.L — Risk / Return Rank
DHS.L
DEMD.L
DHS.L vs. DEMD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree US High Dividend UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (DHS.L) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets High Dividend UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (DEMD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DHS.L | DEMD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.27 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.58 | 2.98 | +0.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.31 | 9.65 | +2.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DHS.L vs. DEMD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DHS.L drawdown since its inception was -38.98%, which is greater than DEMD.L's maximum drawdown of -36.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DHS.L and DEMD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DHS.L | DEMD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.98% | -36.00% | -2.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.40% | -6.99% | +0.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.50% | -12.66% | -4.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.39% | -14.49% | -3.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.93% | -29.55% | +0.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.32% | -5.31% | +3.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.19% | -6.75% | -2.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.86% | 2.17% | -0.31% |
Volatility
DHS.L vs. DEMD.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree US High Dividend UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (DHS.L) is 2.57%, while WisdomTree Emerging Markets High Dividend UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (DEMD.L) has a volatility of 4.16%. This indicates that DHS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DEMD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DHS.L | DEMD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.57% | 4.16% | -1.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.13% | 11.16% | -3.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.53% | 13.43% | -2.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.84% | 13.72% | +0.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.89% | 16.33% | -1.44% |
DHS.L vs. DEMD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
DHS.L has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than DEMD.L's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
DHS.L vs. DEMD.L - Dividend Comparison
DHS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.63%, less than DEMD.L's 3.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEMD.L WisdomTree Emerging Markets High Dividend UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 3.70% | 4.42% | 7.88% | 6.68% | 7.48% | 4.20% | 4.51% | 4.13% | 4.39% | 1.98% | 1.68% | 4.75% |
DHS.L WisdomTree US High Dividend UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 2.63% | 2.89% | 5.19% | 5.19% | 2.83% | 2.87% | 5.63% | 4.86% | 3.06% | 2.70% | 2.51% | 2.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DHS.L and DEMD.L have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DHS.L is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DHS.L is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for DEMD.L.
DHS.L is categorized as Dividend, while DEMD.L is Emerging Markets Equities. DHS.L tracks WisdomTree US High Dividend UCITS Index, while DEMD.L tracks WisdomTree Emerging Markets High Dividend UCITS Index. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for DHS.L and 0.46% for DEMD.L.
Find the right allocation for DHS.L and DEMD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer