PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DHMAX vs. FLMVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DHMAX vs. FLMVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Diamond Hill Small-Mid Cap Fund (DHMAX) and JPMorgan Mid Cap Value Fund (FLMVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DHMAX achieves a 2.66% return, which is significantly lower than FLMVX's 7.40% return. Over the past 10 years, DHMAX has underperformed FLMVX with an annualized return of 6.94%, while FLMVX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.20% annualized return.


DHMAX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.18%
YTD
2.66%
6M
2.88%
1Y
14.14%
3Y*
9.45%
5Y*
3.72%
10Y*
6.94%

FLMVX

1D
0.62%
1M
0.82%
YTD
7.40%
6M
7.73%
1Y
14.09%
3Y*
17.57%
5Y*
9.02%
10Y*
10.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DHMAX vs. FLMVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DHMAX
Diamond Hill Small-Mid Cap Fund
2.66%8.26%7.77%11.15%-13.88%30.75%1.03%27.39%-12.85%5.47%
FLMVX
JPMorgan Mid Cap Value Fund
7.40%5.17%27.75%11.38%-8.11%29.89%0.36%26.67%-11.66%13.67%

Correlation

The correlation between DHMAX and FLMVX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2006

0.94

The correlation between DHMAX and FLMVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DHMAX vs. FLMVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DHMAX
DHMAX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
DHMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DHMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
DHMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
DHMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
DHMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

FLMVX
FLMVX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
FLMVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLMVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLMVX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
FLMVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLMVX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DHMAX vs. FLMVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Diamond Hill Small-Mid Cap Fund (DHMAX) and JPMorgan Mid Cap Value Fund (FLMVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DHMAXFLMVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.22

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.45

2.10

-0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.30

7.09

-2.79

DHMAX vs. FLMVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DHMAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is comparable to the FLMVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DHMAX and FLMVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DHMAXFLMVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

1.26

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

0.47

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

0.50

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.62

-0.28

Drawdowns

DHMAX vs. FLMVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DHMAX drawdown since its inception was -57.04%, roughly equal to the maximum FLMVX drawdown of -54.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DHMAX and FLMVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DHMAXFLMVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.04%

-54.72%

-2.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.73%

-7.19%

-3.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.90%

-15.91%

-4.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.02%

-25.59%

+2.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.46%

-43.06%

-2.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.37%

-0.67%

-2.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.40%

-6.45%

-0.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.60%

2.13%

+1.47%

Volatility

DHMAX vs. FLMVX - Volatility Comparison

Diamond Hill Small-Mid Cap Fund (DHMAX) has a higher volatility of 3.77% compared to JPMorgan Mid Cap Value Fund (FLMVX) at 2.70%. This indicates that DHMAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLMVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DHMAXFLMVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.77%

2.70%

+1.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.67%

8.48%

+2.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.53%

11.99%

+3.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.41%

19.36%

+0.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.06%

20.44%

+0.62%

DHMAX vs. FLMVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DHMAX has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than FLMVX's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

DHMAX vs. FLMVX - Dividend Comparison

DHMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.98%, less than FLMVX's 19.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DHMAX
Diamond Hill Small-Mid Cap Fund
5.98%6.14%7.75%1.00%5.01%5.55%0.49%4.81%4.51%0.45%1.74%1.20%
FLMVX
JPMorgan Mid Cap Value Fund
19.70%21.16%23.25%6.10%11.73%14.98%7.73%5.20%8.30%2.71%7.04%6.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, DHMAX and FLMVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DHMAX has higher volatility (3.77%) compared to FLMVX (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DHMAX dropped -57.04% vs FLMVX's -54.72%.

FLMVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.26 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DHMAX and FLMVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer