PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DHLYX vs. FGIPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DHLYX vs. FGIPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Diamond Hill Large Cap Fund Class Y (DHLYX) and Nomura Growth and Income Fund Institutional Class (FGIPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DHLYX achieves a 5.33% return, which is significantly lower than FGIPX's 23.56% return. Over the past 10 years, DHLYX has underperformed FGIPX with an annualized return of 10.13%, while FGIPX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.19% annualized return.


DHLYX

1D
-0.44%
1M
3.87%
6M
4.32%
YTD
5.33%
1Y
6.29%
3Y*
9.50%
5Y*
5.73%
10Y*
10.13%
ALL TIME*
11.02%

FGIPX

1D
0.49%
1M
4.09%
6M
16.63%
YTD
23.56%
1Y
43.78%
3Y*
25.54%
5Y*
17.72%
10Y*
13.19%
ALL TIME*
12.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

DHLYX vs. FGIPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DHLYX
Diamond Hill Large Cap Fund Class Y
5.33%5.76%12.20%13.83%-13.27%25.88%9.05%32.39%-9.54%20.40%
FGIPX
Nomura Growth and Income Fund Institutional Class
23.56%30.18%15.44%12.17%3.28%21.73%-4.59%25.96%-9.95%18.52%

Correlation

The correlation between DHLYX and FGIPX is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2013

0.91

Over the past year, the correlation between DHLYX and FGIPX has dropped to 0.61 - well below their long-term average of 0.91, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DHLYX vs. FGIPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DHLYX
DHLYX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
DHLYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DHLYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
DHLYX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
DHLYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
DHLYX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

FGIPX
FGIPX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
FGIPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGIPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGIPX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
FGIPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGIPX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DHLYX vs. FGIPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Diamond Hill Large Cap Fund Class Y (DHLYX) and Nomura Growth and Income Fund Institutional Class (FGIPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DHLYXFGIPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.66

-0.56

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.76

6.00

-5.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.94

23.09

-21.16

DHLYX vs. FGIPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DHLYX Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is lower than the FGIPX Sharpe Ratio of 3.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DHLYX and FGIPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DHLYX vs. FGIPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DHLYX drawdown since its inception was -38.87%, roughly equal to the maximum FGIPX drawdown of -37.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DHLYX and FGIPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DHLYXFGIPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.87%

-37.32%

-1.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.31%

-7.26%

-1.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.54%

-13.27%

-2.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.10%

-16.19%

-6.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.87%

-37.32%

-1.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.44%

0.00%

-0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.50%

-4.14%

-0.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.27%

1.91%

+1.36%

Volatility

DHLYX vs. FGIPX - Volatility Comparison

Diamond Hill Large Cap Fund Class Y (DHLYX) has a higher volatility of 3.48% compared to Nomura Growth and Income Fund Institutional Class (FGIPX) at 2.21%. This indicates that DHLYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGIPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DHLYXFGIPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.48%

2.21%

+1.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.17%

8.63%

-0.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.49%

11.85%

-0.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.83%

14.85%

+0.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.98%

17.06%

+0.92%

DHLYX vs. FGIPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DHLYX has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than FGIPX's 0.77% expense ratio.


Dividends

DHLYX vs. FGIPX - Dividend Comparison

DHLYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.17%, less than FGIPX's 9.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DHLYX
Diamond Hill Large Cap Fund Class Y
6.17%6.50%10.75%3.89%6.75%7.63%3.57%4.86%4.74%4.87%6.65%5.18%
FGIPX
Nomura Growth and Income Fund Institutional Class
9.33%11.68%12.69%7.50%7.35%12.20%2.13%52.72%25.63%5.58%4.22%5.88%

Frequently Asked Questions


DHLYX and FGIPX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DHLYX has higher volatility (3.48%) compared to FGIPX (2.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DHLYX dropped -38.87% vs FGIPX's -37.32%.

FGIPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.68 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DHLYX and FGIPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer