DHLX vs. FUMB
DHLX (Diamond Hill Large Cap Concentrated ETF) and FUMB (First Trust Ultra Short Duration Municipal ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DHLX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Actively Managed, while FUMB is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by First Trust. DHLX is passively managed, while FUMB is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. DHLX charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FUMB.
Performance
DHLX vs. FUMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DHLX achieves a -1.56% return, which is significantly lower than FUMB's 1.30% return.
DHLX
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- -1.44%
- YTD
- -1.56%
- 6M
- -2.11%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FUMB
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 1.30%
- 6M
- 1.25%
- 1Y
- 2.65%
- 3Y*
- 2.97%
- 5Y*
- 2.01%
- 10Y*
- —
DHLX vs. FUMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DHLX Diamond Hill Large Cap Concentrated ETF | -1.56% | 1.22% |
FUMB First Trust Ultra Short Duration Municipal ETF | 1.30% | 0.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between DHLX and FUMB is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2025 | -0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DHLX vs. FUMB — Risk / Return Rank
DHLX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FUMB
DHLX vs. FUMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Diamond Hill Large Cap Concentrated ETF (DHLX) and First Trust Ultra Short Duration Municipal ETF (FUMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DHLX | FUMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.77 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 12.17 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 45.58 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DHLX vs. FUMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DHLX drawdown since its inception was -8.40%, which is greater than FUMB's maximum drawdown of -2.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DHLX and FUMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DHLX | FUMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.40% | -2.68% | -5.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.22% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.60% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -1.25% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.41% | -0.10% | -5.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.56% | -0.19% | -2.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.06% | — |
Volatility
DHLX vs. FUMB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DHLX | FUMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.24% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.56% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.31% | 0.78% | +10.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.31% | 1.17% | +10.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.31% | 1.76% | +9.55% |
DHLX vs. FUMB - Expense Ratio Comparison
DHLX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than FUMB's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
DHLX vs. FUMB - Dividend Comparison
DHLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, less than FUMB's 2.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DHLX Diamond Hill Large Cap Concentrated ETF | 0.41% | 0.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FUMB First Trust Ultra Short Duration Municipal ETF | 2.79% | 2.90% | 2.86% | 2.24% | 1.02% | 0.43% | 0.94% | 1.74% | 0.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DHLX and FUMB have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FUMB is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FUMB is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for DHLX.
FUMB has the higher dividend yield at 2.79%, compared with 0.41% for DHLX.
DHLX is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while FUMB is Municipal Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Diamond Hill and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for DHLX and 0.45% for FUMB.
Find the right allocation for DHLX and FUMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer