DHLX vs. DBC
DHLX (Diamond Hill Large Cap Concentrated ETF) and DBC (Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - DHLX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Actively Managed, while DBC is a Commodities fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. DHLX charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for DBC.
Performance
DHLX vs. DBC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DHLX achieves a 2.88% return, which is significantly lower than DBC's 27.28% return.
DHLX
- 1D
- 2.41%
- 1M
- 3.47%
- 6M
- 2.53%
- YTD
- 2.88%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DBC
- 1D
- -1.15%
- 1M
- 2.01%
- 6M
- 22.67%
- YTD
- 27.28%
- 1Y
- 31.86%
- 3Y*
- 11.51%
- 5Y*
- 11.45%
- 10Y*
- 8.52%
DHLX vs. DBC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DHLX Diamond Hill Large Cap Concentrated ETF | 2.88% | 1.22% |
DBC Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund | 27.28% | 1.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between DHLX and DBC is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2025 | -0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DHLX vs. DBC — Risk / Return Rank
DHLX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DBC
DHLX vs. DBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Diamond Hill Large Cap Concentrated ETF (DHLX) and Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (DBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DHLX | DBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.29 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.94 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.62 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DHLX vs. DBC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DHLX drawdown since its inception was -8.40%, smaller than the maximum DBC drawdown of -76.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DHLX and DBC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DHLX | DBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.40% | -76.36% | +67.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.54% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.54% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.14% | -26.37% | +25.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.66% | -46.12% | +43.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.82% | — |
Volatility
DHLX vs. DBC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DHLX | DBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.03% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.71% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.69% | 18.85% | -7.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.69% | 19.29% | -7.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.69% | 17.80% | -6.11% |
DHLX vs. DBC - Expense Ratio Comparison
DHLX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than DBC's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
DHLX vs. DBC - Dividend Comparison
DHLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than DBC's 2.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBC Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund | 2.61% | 3.33% | 5.22% | 4.94% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.59% | 1.30% |
DHLX Diamond Hill Large Cap Concentrated ETF | 0.65% | 0.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DHLX and DBC have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DHLX is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DHLX is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DBC.
DBC has the higher dividend yield at 2.61%, compared with 0.65% for DHLX.
DHLX is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while DBC is Commodities. DHLX tracks Actively Managed, while DBC tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Index Excess Return. They also come from different issuers: Diamond Hill and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for DHLX and 0.85% for DBC.
Find the right allocation for DHLX and DBC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer