DHHF.AX vs. BGB
Compare and contrast key facts about Betashares Diversified All Growth ETF (DHHF.AX) and Blackstone GSO Strategic Credit Closed Fund (BGB).
DHHF.AX is an actively managed fund by BetaShares. It was launched on Dec 3, 2019. BGB is an actively managed fund by Blackstone. It was launched on Sep 26, 2012.
Performance
DHHF.AX vs. BGB - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DHHF.AX vs. BGB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DHHF.AX Betashares Diversified All Growth ETF | -4.82% | 11.88% | 21.74% | 17.00% | -8.93% | 23.07% | 3.80% | 0.84% |
BGB Blackstone GSO Strategic Credit Closed Fund | -7.35% | -2.81% | 30.63% | 19.59% | -10.52% | 22.18% | -13.06% | 2.17% |
Different Trading Currencies
DHHF.AX is traded in AUD, while BGB is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BGB values have been converted to AUD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DHHF.AX achieves a -4.82% return, which is significantly higher than BGB's -7.35% return.
DHHF.AX
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- -5.52%
- YTD
- -4.82%
- 6M
- -3.50%
- 1Y
- 10.09%
- 3Y*
- 13.00%
- 5Y*
- 9.71%
- 10Y*
- —
BGB
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- 2.13%
- YTD
- -7.35%
- 6M
- -8.78%
- 1Y
- -9.31%
- 3Y*
- 10.21%
- 5Y*
- 7.04%
- 10Y*
- 8.06%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DHHF.AX vs. BGB - Expense Ratio Comparison
DHHF.AX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than BGB's 2.36% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DHHF.AX vs. BGB — Risk / Return Rank
DHHF.AX
BGB
DHHF.AX vs. BGB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Betashares Diversified All Growth ETF (DHHF.AX) and Blackstone GSO Strategic Credit Closed Fund (BGB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DHHF.AX | BGB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.79 | -0.76 | +1.55 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.17 | -0.96 | +2.14 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 0.88 | +0.29 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.17 | -0.52 | +1.69 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.00 | -1.28 | +5.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DHHF.AX | BGB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 | -0.76 | +1.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 | 0.57 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 0.46 | +0.26 |
Correlation
The correlation between DHHF.AX and BGB is 0.05, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
DHHF.AX vs. BGB - Dividend Comparison
DHHF.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.30%, less than BGB's 8.87% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DHHF.AX Betashares Diversified All Growth ETF | 2.30% | 2.13% | 1.99% | 2.38% | 4.24% | 1.28% | 1.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BGB Blackstone GSO Strategic Credit Closed Fund | 8.87% | 8.58% | 9.26% | 10.69% | 7.35% | 6.63% | 8.77% | 9.30% | 11.18% | 7.35% | 8.76% | 9.42% |
Drawdowns
DHHF.AX vs. BGB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DHHF.AX drawdown since its inception was -28.54%, smaller than the maximum BGB drawdown of -37.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DHHF.AX and BGB.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DHHF.AX | BGB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.54% | -44.87% | +16.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.03% | -10.03% | +2.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.30% | -21.23% | +3.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.87% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.90% | -7.31% | +0.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.25% | -5.99% | +1.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.35% | 3.90% | -1.55% |
Volatility
DHHF.AX vs. BGB - Volatility Comparison
Betashares Diversified All Growth ETF (DHHF.AX) has a higher volatility of 4.95% compared to Blackstone GSO Strategic Credit Closed Fund (BGB) at 4.08%. This indicates that DHHF.AX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BGB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DHHF.AX | BGB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.95% | 4.08% | +0.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.61% | 7.01% | +0.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.84% | 12.37% | +0.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.16% | 12.43% | -1.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.28% | 16.76% | -3.48% |