PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DHDG vs. SMAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DHDG vs. SMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Quarterly 2.5 to 15 Buffer ETF (DHDG) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Sep ETF (SMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DHDG achieves a 7.00% return, which is significantly higher than SMAX's 3.09% return.


DHDG

1D
-0.10%
1M
2.10%
YTD
7.00%
6M
7.44%
1Y
15.18%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SMAX

1D
-0.09%
1M
1.09%
YTD
3.09%
6M
3.54%
1Y
9.17%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DHDG vs. SMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DHDG and SMAX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2024

0.80

The correlation between DHDG and SMAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DHDG vs. SMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DHDG
DHDG Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
DHDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DHDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
DHDG Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
DHDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
DHDG Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

SMAX
SMAX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
SMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
SMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DHDG vs. SMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Quarterly 2.5 to 15 Buffer ETF (DHDG) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Sep ETF (SMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DHDGSMAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

1.75

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.17

4.81

-0.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.11

26.11

-9.00

DHDG vs. SMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DHDG Sharpe Ratio is 2.84, which is comparable to the SMAX Sharpe Ratio of 3.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DHDG and SMAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DHDGSMAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.84

3.46

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.60

2.01

-0.41

Drawdowns

DHDG vs. SMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DHDG drawdown since its inception was -8.26%, which is greater than SMAX's maximum drawdown of -3.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DHDG and SMAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DHDGSMAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.26%

-3.90%

-4.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.66%

-1.91%

-1.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-0.09%

-0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.87%

-0.40%

-0.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.89%

0.35%

+0.54%

Volatility

DHDG vs. SMAX - Volatility Comparison

FT Vest U.S. Equity Quarterly 2.5 to 15 Buffer ETF (DHDG) has a higher volatility of 0.93% compared to iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Sep ETF (SMAX) at 0.38%. This indicates that DHDG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DHDGSMAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.93%

0.38%

+0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.29%

2.10%

+2.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.37%

2.67%

+2.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.48%

3.67%

+3.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.48%

3.67%

+3.81%

DHDG vs. SMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DHDG has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than SMAX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

DHDG vs. SMAX - Dividend Comparison

DHDG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%.


Frequently Asked Questions


DHDG and SMAX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DHDG has higher volatility (0.93%) compared to SMAX (0.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DHDG dropped -8.26% vs SMAX's -3.90%.

On 1-year performance, DHDG leads with 15.18% vs 9.17% for SMAX. On fees, SMAX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, SMAX has been the lower-risk option at 0.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DHDG has performed better with a 15.18% return vs 9.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SMAX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DHDG.

SMAX has the higher dividend yield at 0.95%, compared with 0.00% for DHDG.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DHDG and 0.50% for SMAX.

SMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.46 vs 2.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DHDG and SMAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer