PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DH2O.L vs. INFR.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DH2O.L vs. INFR.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global Water UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (DH2O.L) and iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INFR.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

DH2O.L is traded in USD, while INFR.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the INFR.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DH2O.L achieves a 4.37% return, which is significantly lower than INFR.L's 14.10% return. Over the past 10 years, DH2O.L has outperformed INFR.L with an annualized return of 9.79%, while INFR.L has yielded a comparatively lower 7.31% annualized return.


DH2O.L

1D
0.08%
1M
4.00%
6M
1.18%
YTD
4.37%
1Y
7.63%
3Y*
9.31%
5Y*
5.15%
10Y*
9.79%

INFR.L

1D
0.76%
1M
4.58%
6M
12.86%
YTD
14.10%
1Y
19.11%
3Y*
12.68%
5Y*
6.90%
10Y*
7.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DH2O.L vs. INFR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DH2O.L
iShares Global Water UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
4.37%17.60%4.29%13.57%-20.83%30.67%15.22%33.60%-10.59%27.00%
INFR.L
iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
14.10%13.07%8.91%-0.54%-6.01%17.54%-2.37%24.94%-2.25%14.54%

Correlation

The correlation between DH2O.L and INFR.L is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2007

0.63

Over the past year, the correlation between DH2O.L and INFR.L has dropped to 0.33 - well below their long-term average of 0.63, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DH2O.L vs. INFR.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DH2O.L
DH2O.L Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
DH2O.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DH2O.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
DH2O.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
DH2O.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
DH2O.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

INFR.L
INFR.L Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
INFR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INFR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
INFR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
INFR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
INFR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DH2O.L vs. INFR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Water UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (DH2O.L) and iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INFR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DH2O.LINFR.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.32

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.72

3.71

-2.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.66

9.79

-8.12

DH2O.L vs. INFR.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DH2O.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is lower than the INFR.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DH2O.L and INFR.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DH2O.L vs. INFR.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DH2O.L drawdown since its inception was -56.90%, smaller than the maximum INFR.L drawdown of -72.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DH2O.L and INFR.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DH2O.LINFR.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.90%

-72.74%

+15.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.53%

-5.13%

-5.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.08%

-14.77%

-1.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.43%

-22.49%

-9.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.56%

-34.60%

-0.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.63%

0.00%

-3.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.39%

-40.01%

+29.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.58%

1.95%

+2.63%

Volatility

DH2O.L vs. INFR.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Global Water UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (DH2O.L) has a higher volatility of 4.28% compared to iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INFR.L) at 2.60%. This indicates that DH2O.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INFR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DH2O.LINFR.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.28%

2.60%

+1.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.90%

8.99%

+1.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.64%

10.73%

+2.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.75%

13.71%

+3.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.48%

14.75%

+1.73%

DH2O.L vs. INFR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DH2O.L and INFR.L have an expense ratio of 0.65%.


Dividends

DH2O.L vs. INFR.L - Dividend Comparison

DH2O.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, less than INFR.L's 2.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DH2O.L
iShares Global Water UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
1.34%1.33%1.06%1.18%1.09%1.66%0.94%1.39%1.80%1.46%1.76%1.65%
INFR.L
iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
2.01%2.25%2.32%2.43%2.05%1.89%2.21%2.15%2.27%2.72%2.57%3.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


DH2O.L and INFR.L have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.65% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DH2O.L and INFR.L have the same expense ratio: 0.65% per year.

DH2O.L is categorized as Global Equities, while INFR.L is Utilities Equities. DH2O.L tracks S&P Global Water Index (NET) (USD), while INFR.L tracks FTSE Global Core Infrastructure Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DH2O.L and INFR.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer