PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGX vs. FHKCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGX vs. FHKCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Quest Diagnostics Incorporated (DGX) and Fidelity China Region Fund (FHKCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGX achieves a 14.66% return, which is significantly lower than FHKCX's 29.64% return. Over the past 10 years, DGX has underperformed FHKCX with an annualized return of 12.00%, while FHKCX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.35% annualized return.


DGX

1D
-1.54%
1M
5.24%
YTD
14.66%
6M
9.44%
1Y
15.16%
3Y*
15.88%
5Y*
11.27%
10Y*
12.00%

FHKCX

1D
-5.93%
1M
-3.92%
YTD
29.64%
6M
30.43%
1Y
68.65%
3Y*
30.45%
5Y*
7.32%
10Y*
14.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGX vs. FHKCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DGX
Quest Diagnostics Incorporated
14.66%17.20%11.77%-10.05%-7.80%47.86%14.11%31.13%-13.84%9.16%
FHKCX
Fidelity China Region Fund
29.64%42.56%23.15%-0.29%-23.87%-13.69%47.85%35.12%-17.43%51.94%

Correlation

The correlation between DGX and FHKCX is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 1996

0.20

The correlation between DGX and FHKCX shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGX vs. FHKCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGX
DGX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
DGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
DGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

FHKCX
FHKCX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
FHKCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHKCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHKCX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
FHKCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHKCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGX vs. FHKCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quest Diagnostics Incorporated (DGX) and Fidelity China Region Fund (FHKCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DGXFHKCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.54

-0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.32

6.41

-5.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.74

19.68

-16.94

DGX vs. FHKCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is lower than the FHKCX Sharpe Ratio of 3.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGX and FHKCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DGXFHKCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

3.13

-2.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.30

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.64

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.43

+0.11

Drawdowns

DGX vs. FHKCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGX drawdown since its inception was -49.46%, smaller than the maximum FHKCX drawdown of -61.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGX and FHKCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGXFHKCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.46%

-61.96%

+12.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.55%

-10.80%

-0.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.57%

-22.02%

+5.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.62%

-52.42%

+23.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.60%

-58.41%

+21.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.53%

-7.33%

+0.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.90%

-20.26%

+8.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.54%

3.51%

+2.03%

Volatility

DGX vs. FHKCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Quest Diagnostics Incorporated (DGX) is 5.45%, while Fidelity China Region Fund (FHKCX) has a volatility of 9.34%. This indicates that DGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FHKCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGXFHKCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.45%

9.34%

-3.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.64%

17.87%

-1.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.79%

22.12%

+0.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.76%

24.38%

-2.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.78%

22.40%

+1.38%

Dividends

DGX vs. FHKCX - Dividend Comparison

DGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%, more than FHKCX's 1.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGX
Quest Diagnostics Incorporated
1.65%1.82%1.96%2.02%1.66%1.40%1.85%1.99%2.34%1.83%1.72%2.07%
FHKCX
Fidelity China Region Fund
1.35%1.75%1.39%1.92%1.05%10.77%4.85%0.66%0.83%0.39%1.35%15.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


DGX and FHKCX have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FHKCX has higher volatility (9.34%) compared to DGX (5.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGX dropped -49.46% vs FHKCX's -61.96%.

FHKCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.13 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGX and FHKCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer