PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGTSX vs. HDOGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGTSX vs. HDOGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio (DGTSX) and Hennessy Total Return Fund (HDOGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGTSX achieves a 4.21% return, which is significantly lower than HDOGX's 8.31% return. Over the past 10 years, DGTSX has underperformed HDOGX with an annualized return of 5.07%, while HDOGX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.74% annualized return.


DGTSX

1D
0.42%
1M
-0.07%
6M
2.97%
YTD
4.21%
1Y
8.21%
3Y*
7.71%
5Y*
5.06%
10Y*
5.07%
ALL TIME*
4.71%

HDOGX

1D
-0.64%
1M
0.97%
6M
5.34%
YTD
8.31%
1Y
16.26%
3Y*
10.22%
5Y*
8.44%
10Y*
6.74%
ALL TIME*
5.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

DGTSX vs. HDOGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DGTSX
DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio
4.21%8.39%7.43%8.93%-8.06%10.20%7.29%9.80%-1.85%5.83%
HDOGX
Hennessy Total Return Fund
8.31%14.31%2.89%8.07%6.68%11.80%-4.79%12.56%0.08%11.15%

Correlation

The correlation between DGTSX and HDOGX is 0.22, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 26, 2003

0.72

Over the past year, the correlation between DGTSX and HDOGX has dropped to 0.22 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGTSX vs. HDOGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DGTSX
DGTSX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
DGTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
DGTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

HDOGX
HDOGX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
HDOGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDOGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDOGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
HDOGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDOGX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DGTSX vs. HDOGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio (DGTSX) and Hennessy Total Return Fund (HDOGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DGTSXHDOGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.33

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.02

2.71

+0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.04

5.99

+7.05

DGTSX vs. HDOGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGTSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is comparable to the HDOGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGTSX and HDOGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DGTSX vs. HDOGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGTSX drawdown since its inception was -16.71%, smaller than the maximum HDOGX drawdown of -53.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGTSX and HDOGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGTSXHDOGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.71%

-53.25%

+36.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.64%

-5.67%

+3.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.46%

-7.97%

+0.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.26%

-14.84%

+3.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-11.26%

-25.37%

+14.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.28%

-1.21%

+0.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.64%

-6.80%

+5.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.61%

2.57%

-1.96%

Volatility

DGTSX vs. HDOGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio (DGTSX) is 0.91%, while Hennessy Total Return Fund (HDOGX) has a volatility of 3.75%. This indicates that DGTSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HDOGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGTSXHDOGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.91%

3.75%

-2.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.01%

6.73%

-3.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.65%

8.52%

-4.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.98%

10.17%

-4.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.23%

11.73%

-6.50%

DGTSX vs. HDOGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGTSX has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than HDOGX's 1.77% expense ratio.


Dividends

DGTSX vs. HDOGX - Dividend Comparison

DGTSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.81%, more than HDOGX's 2.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGTSX
DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio
5.81%5.54%7.28%4.75%2.77%7.62%2.12%2.57%2.99%1.25%1.26%1.50%
HDOGX
Hennessy Total Return Fund
2.01%2.17%3.80%7.55%11.88%1.35%8.29%1.72%4.91%12.76%1.17%11.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


DGTSX and HDOGX have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HDOGX has higher volatility (3.75%) compared to DGTSX (0.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGTSX dropped -16.71% vs HDOGX's -53.25%.

DGTSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGTSX and HDOGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer