DGTSX vs. DMA

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

DGTSX (DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio) and DMA (Dimensional Managed Account Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds from Dimensional. Over the past 3 years, DGTSX returned 8.01%/yr vs 23.73%/yr for DMA. Their 0.29 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. DGTSX charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for DMA.

Performance

DGTSX vs. DMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio (DGTSX) and Dimensional Managed Account Fund (DMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGTSX achieves a 4.57% return, which is significantly higher than DMA's -7.61% return.

DGTSX

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: 0.28%
• 6M: 3.25%
• YTD: 4.57%
• 1Y: 8.12%
• 3Y*: 8.01%
• 5Y*: 5.10%
• 10Y*: 5.10%
• ALL TIME*: 4.73%

DMA

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: -0.27%
• 6M: -8.45%
• YTD: -7.61%
• 1Y: -0.51%
• 3Y*: 23.73%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -1.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DGTSX DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
DMA Dimensional Managed Account Fund	$150.59K	$141.22K	$169.03K

DGTSX vs. DMA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
DGTSX DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio	4.57%	8.39%	7.43%	8.93%	-7.62%
DMA Dimensional Managed Account Fund	-7.61%	16.89%	41.06%	-3.81%	-37.55%

Correlation

The correlation between DGTSX and DMA is 0.31, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.31
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2022	0.29

Return for Risk

DGTSX vs. DMA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DGTSX

DGTSX Risk / Return Rank: 91
DGTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
DGTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
DGTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 90
DGTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
DGTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 92

DMA

DMA Risk / Return Rank: 3
DMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
DMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
DMA Omega Ratio Rank: 3
DMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
DMA Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DGTSX vs. DMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio (DGTSX) and Dimensional Managed Account Fund (DMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DGTSX	DMA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.37	-0.03	+2.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.51	0.06	+3.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.01	+0.46
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.28	-0.03	+3.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.16	-0.07	+14.23

DGTSX vs. DMA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGTSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is higher than the DMA Sharpe Ratio of -0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGTSX and DMA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DGTSX vs. DMA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGTSX drawdown since its inception was -16.71%, smaller than the maximum DMA drawdown of -53.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGTSX and DMA.

Drawdown Indicators

	DGTSX	DMA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.71%	-53.24%	+36.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.64%	-18.34%	+15.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.46%	-18.34%	+10.88%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-11.26%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-11.26%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-9.26%	+9.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.64%	-25.24%	+23.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.61%	7.23%	-6.62%

Volatility

DGTSX vs. DMA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio (DGTSX) is 0.96%, while Dimensional Managed Account Fund (DMA) has a volatility of 4.09%. This indicates that DGTSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DGTSX	DMA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.96%	4.09%	-3.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.03%	14.14%	-11.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.66%	15.62%	-11.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.98%	26.98%	-21.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.23%	26.98%	-21.75%

DGTSX vs. DMA - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGTSX has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than DMA's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

DGTSX vs. DMA - Dividend Comparison

DGTSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.79%, less than DMA's 16.64% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DGTSX DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio	5.79%	5.54%	7.28%	4.75%	2.77%	7.62%	2.12%	2.57%	2.99%	1.25%	1.26%	1.50%
DMA Dimensional Managed Account Fund	16.64%	9.42%	3.83%	5.22%	10.14%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DGTSX and DMA in my portfolio?

DGTSX and DMA have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DGTSX or DMA?

DMA has higher volatility (4.09%) compared to DGTSX (0.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGTSX dropped -16.71% vs DMA's -53.24%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DGTSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.