DGSFX vs. DFGFX
Compare and contrast key facts about DFA Global Sustainability Fixed Income Portfolio (DGSFX) and DFA Two Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio (DFGFX).
DGSFX is managed by Dimensional. It was launched on Nov 5, 2018. DFGFX is managed by Dimensional. It was launched on Feb 8, 1996.
Performance
DGSFX vs. DFGFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DGSFX vs. DFGFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGSFX DFA Global Sustainability Fixed Income Portfolio | -0.62% | 3.80% | 2.60% | 9.67% | -15.61% | -2.95% | 7.99% | 9.85% | 1.15% |
DFGFX DFA Two Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio | 0.77% | 2.89% | 5.36% | 4.95% | -2.62% | -0.37% | 0.88% | 2.87% | 0.85% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DGSFX achieves a -0.62% return, which is significantly lower than DFGFX's 0.77% return.
DGSFX
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- -2.49%
- YTD
- -0.62%
- 6M
- -0.27%
- 1Y
- 1.96%
- 3Y*
- 3.92%
- 5Y*
- -0.17%
- 10Y*
- —
DFGFX
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.05%
- YTD
- 0.77%
- 6M
- 1.79%
- 1Y
- 2.53%
- 3Y*
- 4.23%
- 5Y*
- 2.13%
- 10Y*
- 1.75%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DGSFX vs. DFGFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DGSFX has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is higher than DFGFX's 0.16% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
DGSFX vs. DFGFX — Risk / Return Rank
DGSFX
DFGFX
DGSFX vs. DFGFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Global Sustainability Fixed Income Portfolio (DGSFX) and DFA Two Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio (DFGFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DGSFX | DFGFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.59 | 1.71 | -1.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.83 | 1.85 | -1.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 2.61 | -1.50 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.82 | 1.87 | -1.05 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.64 | 5.76 | -3.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DGSFX | DFGFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 | 1.71 | -1.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 | 1.19 | -1.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.29 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 2.27 | -1.91 |
Correlation
The correlation between DGSFX and DFGFX is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
DGSFX vs. DFGFX - Dividend Comparison
DGSFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%, more than DFGFX's 3.12% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGSFX DFA Global Sustainability Fixed Income Portfolio | 3.60% | 3.02% | 4.26% | 4.09% | 1.97% | 1.15% | 1.72% | 3.37% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DFGFX DFA Two Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio | 3.12% | 2.67% | 4.77% | 3.19% | 1.17% | 0.23% | 0.57% | 2.24% | 2.21% | 1.54% | 0.65% | 0.02% |
Drawdowns
DGSFX vs. DFGFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DGSFX drawdown since its inception was -21.57%, which is greater than DFGFX's maximum drawdown of -4.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGSFX and DFGFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DGSFX | DFGFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.57% | -4.00% | -17.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.91% | -1.41% | -1.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.29% | -4.00% | -17.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -4.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.03% | 0.00% | -5.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.66% | -0.23% | -6.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.91% | 0.46% | +0.45% |
Volatility
DGSFX vs. DFGFX - Volatility Comparison
DFA Global Sustainability Fixed Income Portfolio (DGSFX) has a higher volatility of 1.60% compared to DFA Two Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio (DFGFX) at 0.22%. This indicates that DGSFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFGFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DGSFX | DFGFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.60% | 0.22% | +1.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.30% | 0.44% | +1.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.71% | 1.56% | +2.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.31% | 1.81% | +3.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.89% | 1.36% | +3.53% |