DGSCX vs. GLOSX
DGSCX (Virtus Global Small-Cap Fund) and GLOSX (Pioneer Global Sustainable Equity Fund Class A) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, DGSCX returned 7.65%/yr vs 13.72%/yr for GLOSX. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DGSCX charges 1.28%/yr vs 1.10%/yr for GLOSX.
Performance
DGSCX vs. GLOSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DGSCX achieves a 6.08% return, which is significantly lower than GLOSX's 14.65% return. Over the past 10 years, DGSCX has underperformed GLOSX with an annualized return of 7.65%, while GLOSX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.72% annualized return.
DGSCX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.53%
- 6M
- 1.66%
- YTD
- 6.08%
- 1Y
- -2.93%
- 3Y*
- 7.48%
- 5Y*
- 2.28%
- 10Y*
- 7.65%
GLOSX
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- -0.83%
- 6M
- 10.47%
- YTD
- 14.65%
- 1Y
- 32.99%
- 3Y*
- 23.54%
- 5Y*
- 15.52%
- 10Y*
- 13.72%
DGSCX vs. GLOSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGSCX Virtus Global Small-Cap Fund | 6.08% | -0.96% | 9.71% | 24.03% | -24.11% | 11.23% | 29.79% | 23.02% | -16.82% | 26.86% |
GLOSX Pioneer Global Sustainable Equity Fund Class A | 14.65% | 41.25% | 11.45% | 16.70% | -9.75% | 23.28% | 17.79% | 23.30% | -16.32% | 21.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between DGSCX and GLOSX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2006 | 0.87 |
Over the past year, the correlation between DGSCX and GLOSX has dropped to 0.62 - well below their long-term average of 0.87, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DGSCX vs. GLOSX — Risk / Return Rank
DGSCX
GLOSX
DGSCX vs. GLOSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Global Small-Cap Fund (DGSCX) and Pioneer Global Sustainable Equity Fund Class A (GLOSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DGSCX | GLOSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.41 | -0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.15 | 3.29 | -3.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.32 | 12.78 | -13.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DGSCX vs. GLOSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DGSCX drawdown since its inception was -68.18%, which is greater than GLOSX's maximum drawdown of -54.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGSCX and GLOSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DGSCX | GLOSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.18% | -54.40% | -13.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.85% | -10.04% | -6.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.04% | -14.66% | -3.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.49% | -23.72% | -13.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.29% | -33.59% | -6.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.35% | -1.27% | -4.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.63% | -9.74% | -9.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.91% | 2.58% | +5.33% |
Volatility
DGSCX vs. GLOSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Virtus Global Small-Cap Fund (DGSCX) is 2.89%, while Pioneer Global Sustainable Equity Fund Class A (GLOSX) has a volatility of 3.76%. This indicates that DGSCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLOSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DGSCX | GLOSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.89% | 3.76% | -0.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.90% | 11.35% | -1.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.48% | 14.13% | -1.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.94% | 15.70% | +2.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.13% | 16.74% | +2.39% |
DGSCX vs. GLOSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DGSCX has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than GLOSX's 1.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
DGSCX vs. GLOSX - Dividend Comparison
DGSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.34%, less than GLOSX's 10.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGSCX Virtus Global Small-Cap Fund | 4.34% | 4.61% | 14.50% | 0.84% | 2.64% | 30.56% | 4.16% | 7.03% | 21.96% | 7.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GLOSX Pioneer Global Sustainable Equity Fund Class A | 10.06% | 11.53% | 7.73% | 1.55% | 6.04% | 21.00% | 0.87% | 0.93% | 10.44% | 1.27% | 1.25% | 0.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DGSCX and GLOSX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GLOSX has higher volatility (3.76%) compared to DGSCX (2.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGSCX dropped -68.18% vs GLOSX's -54.40%.
GLOSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DGSCX and GLOSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer