DF.TO vs. LFE.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Dividend 15 Split Corp. II (DF.TO) and Canadian Life Companies Split Corp. (LFE.TO).
Performance
DF.TO vs. LFE.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DF.TO vs. LFE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DF.TO Dividend 15 Split Corp. II | 2.53% | 47.92% | 74.13% | 4.68% | -33.33% | 144.80% | -38.01% | 65.78% | -59.09% | 39.97% |
LFE.TO Canadian Life Companies Split Corp. | -3.52% | 30.06% | 108.15% | 59.77% | -30.86% | 69.79% | -35.91% | 97.52% | -64.57% | 33.07% |
Fundamentals
DF.TO:
CA$172.20M
LFE.TO:
CA$85.14M
DF.TO:
CA$6.35
LFE.TO:
CA$5.91
DF.TO:
1.17
LFE.TO:
1.17
DF.TO:
0.03
LFE.TO:
0.02
DF.TO:
3.28
LFE.TO:
2.44
DF.TO:
0.87
LFE.TO:
0.73
DF.TO:
CA$50.72M
LFE.TO:
CA$32.15M
DF.TO:
CA$118.58M
LFE.TO:
CA$28.94M
DF.TO:
CA$172.63M
LFE.TO:
CA$81.89M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DF.TO achieves a 2.53% return, which is significantly higher than LFE.TO's -3.52% return. Over the past 10 years, DF.TO has underperformed LFE.TO with an annualized return of 12.97%, while LFE.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 17.66% annualized return.
DF.TO
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- -6.19%
- YTD
- 2.53%
- 6M
- 17.13%
- 1Y
- 64.13%
- 3Y*
- 39.27%
- 5Y*
- 22.90%
- 10Y*
- 12.97%
LFE.TO
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- -5.08%
- YTD
- -3.52%
- 6M
- 18.36%
- 1Y
- 33.86%
- 3Y*
- 55.72%
- 5Y*
- 25.17%
- 10Y*
- 17.66%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DF.TO vs. LFE.TO — Risk / Return Rank
DF.TO
LFE.TO
DF.TO vs. LFE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dividend 15 Split Corp. II (DF.TO) and Canadian Life Companies Split Corp. (LFE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DF.TO | LFE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.05 | 1.26 | +1.79 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.60 | 1.72 | +1.88 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.68 | 1.29 | +0.39 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.13 | 1.71 | +3.42 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.11 | 6.52 | +17.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DF.TO | LFE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.05 | 1.26 | +1.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | 0.60 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 | 0.36 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.00 | 0.05 | -0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between DF.TO and LFE.TO is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
DF.TO vs. LFE.TO - Dividend Comparison
DF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.80%, less than LFE.TO's 15.92% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DF.TO Dividend 15 Split Corp. II | 14.80% | 16.15% | 13.16% | 0.00% | 12.99% | 14.42% | 10.20% | 11.79% | 8.70% | 13.64% | 13.72% | 19.47% |
LFE.TO Canadian Life Companies Split Corp. | 15.92% | 16.33% | 12.11% | 0.00% | 9.55% | 1.32% | 10.41% | 2.44% | 4.50% | 14.13% | 4.54% | 2.47% |
Drawdowns
DF.TO vs. LFE.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DF.TO drawdown since its inception was -83.79%, smaller than the maximum LFE.TO drawdown of -89.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DF.TO and LFE.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DF.TO | LFE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.79% | -89.14% | +5.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.75% | -20.46% | +7.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.69% | -56.68% | -8.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.77% | -81.11% | +11.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.12% | -12.23% | +5.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.97% | -53.72% | +30.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.71% | 5.47% | -2.76% |
Volatility
DF.TO vs. LFE.TO - Volatility Comparison
Dividend 15 Split Corp. II (DF.TO) and Canadian Life Companies Split Corp. (LFE.TO) have volatilities of 11.68% and 11.55%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DF.TO | LFE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.68% | 11.55% | +0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.71% | 15.07% | -0.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.16% | 26.98% | -5.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.20% | 42.22% | -10.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.93% | 49.51% | -12.58% |
Financials
DF.TO vs. LFE.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Dividend 15 Split Corp. II and Canadian Life Companies Split Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities