PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGRG.L vs. HPAS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGRG.L vs. HPAS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc (DGRG.L) and HSBC MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Acc (HPAS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

DGRG.L is traded in GBp, while HPAS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the HPAS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGRG.L achieves a 6.87% return, which is significantly lower than HPAS.L's 10.66% return.


DGRG.L

1D
0.15%
1M
4.47%
YTD
6.87%
6M
6.31%
1Y
21.18%
3Y*
13.50%
5Y*
12.91%
10Y*

HPAS.L

1D
0.03%
1M
8.95%
YTD
10.66%
6M
10.37%
1Y
27.35%
3Y*
17.72%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGRG.L vs. HPAS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DGRG.L
WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc
6.87%5.60%20.13%12.11%2.74%11.70%
HPAS.L
HSBC MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Acc
10.66%5.65%26.90%22.43%-14.66%11.67%

Correlation

The correlation between DGRG.L and HPAS.L is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2021

0.86

The correlation between DGRG.L and HPAS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGRG.L vs. HPAS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGRG.L
DGRG.L Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
DGRG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

HPAS.L
HPAS.L Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
HPAS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HPAS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
HPAS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
HPAS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
HPAS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGRG.L vs. HPAS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc (DGRG.L) and HSBC MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Acc (HPAS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DGRG.LHPAS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.41

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.53

2.17

+1.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.98

6.23

+6.75

DGRG.L vs. HPAS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGRG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is comparable to the HPAS.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGRG.L and HPAS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DGRG.LHPAS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.38

2.25

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.01

0.76

+0.24

Drawdowns

DGRG.L vs. HPAS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGRG.L drawdown since its inception was -22.57%, roughly equal to the maximum HPAS.L drawdown of -23.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRG.L and HPAS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGRG.LHPAS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.57%

-23.23%

+0.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.98%

-12.57%

+6.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.72%

-23.23%

+5.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.09%

+0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.96%

-5.99%

+3.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.63%

4.38%

-2.75%

Volatility

DGRG.L vs. HPAS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc (DGRG.L) is 2.40%, while HSBC MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF USD Acc (HPAS.L) has a volatility of 3.26%. This indicates that DGRG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HPAS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGRG.LHPAS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.40%

3.26%

-0.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.19%

8.55%

-2.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.86%

12.09%

-3.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.55%

15.73%

-3.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.45%

15.73%

-1.28%

DGRG.L vs. HPAS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGRG.L has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than HPAS.L's 0.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

DGRG.L vs. HPAS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither DGRG.L nor HPAS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


DGRG.L and HPAS.L have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HPAS.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HPAS.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for DGRG.L.

DGRG.L tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth UCITS Index, while HPAS.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for DGRG.L and 0.12% for HPAS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGRG.L and HPAS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer