PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGRE vs. NTSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGRE vs. NTSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRE) and WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGRE achieves a 29.96% return, which is significantly higher than NTSX's 9.50% return.


DGRE

1D
-1.02%
1M
4.94%
YTD
29.96%
6M
35.37%
1Y
55.03%
3Y*
23.90%
5Y*
8.39%
10Y*
9.47%

NTSX

1D
0.81%
1M
4.30%
YTD
9.50%
6M
8.89%
1Y
25.65%
3Y*
19.75%
5Y*
9.87%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGRE vs. NTSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
DGRE
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund
29.96%27.47%3.63%18.46%-21.86%2.55%10.85%21.12%-10.19%
NTSX
WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund
9.50%18.82%20.20%22.70%-25.84%22.21%24.87%32.03%-8.72%

Correlation

The correlation between DGRE and NTSX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2018

0.60

The correlation between DGRE and NTSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

DGRE vs. NTSX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DGRE
NTSX

Technology

38.6%
35.1%

Financial Services

11.8%
12.3%

Industrials

7.8%
7.7%

Basic Materials

4.4%
1.4%

Consumer Cyclical

2.7%
10.1%

Healthcare

2.6%
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

2.3%
5.5%

Energy

1.1%
3.5%

Utilities

0.9%
2.1%

Communication Services

0.8%
12.5%

Real Estate

0.3%
1.5%

Technology

DGRE
38.6%
NTSX
35.1%

Financial Services

DGRE
11.8%
NTSX
12.3%

Industrials

DGRE
7.8%
NTSX
7.7%

Basic Materials

DGRE
4.4%
NTSX
1.4%

Consumer Cyclical

DGRE
2.7%
NTSX
10.1%

Healthcare

DGRE
2.6%
NTSX
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

DGRE
2.3%
NTSX
5.5%

Energy

DGRE
1.1%
NTSX
3.5%

Utilities

DGRE
0.9%
NTSX
2.1%

Communication Services

DGRE
0.8%
NTSX
12.5%

Real Estate

DGRE
0.3%
NTSX
1.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGRE vs. NTSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGRE
DGRE Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
DGRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRE Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRE Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

NTSX
NTSX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
NTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
NTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGRE vs. NTSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRE) and WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DGRENTSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.38

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.04

2.81

+1.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.49

12.44

+4.05

DGRE vs. NTSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGRE Sharpe Ratio is 2.75, which is higher than the NTSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGRE and NTSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DGRENTSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.75

2.09

+0.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.58

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.72

-0.40

Drawdowns

DGRE vs. NTSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGRE drawdown since its inception was -36.95%, which is greater than NTSX's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGRE and NTSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGRENTSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.95%

-31.34%

-5.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.68%

-9.16%

-4.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.65%

-16.82%

-3.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.82%

-31.34%

-3.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.96%

-0.25%

-1.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.00%

-6.79%

-5.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.35%

2.07%

+1.28%

Volatility

DGRE vs. NTSX - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRE) has a higher volatility of 8.78% compared to WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) at 3.38%. This indicates that DGRE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NTSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGRENTSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.78%

3.38%

+5.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.02%

9.61%

+8.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.11%

12.32%

+7.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.12%

17.04%

+1.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.64%

18.27%

+1.37%

DGRE vs. NTSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGRE has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSX's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

DGRE vs. NTSX - Dividend Comparison

DGRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, more than NTSX's 1.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRE
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund
1.20%1.65%1.90%2.22%4.38%2.56%2.11%2.32%2.71%3.12%3.18%3.01%
NTSX
WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund
1.07%1.14%1.14%1.21%1.36%0.82%0.92%1.42%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DGRE and NTSX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DGRE has higher volatility (8.78%) compared to NTSX (3.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGRE dropped -36.95% vs NTSX's -31.34%.

On 5-year performance, NTSX leads with 9.87% vs 8.39% for DGRE. On fees, NTSX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, NTSX has been the lower-risk option at 3.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, NTSX has performed better with a 9.87% return vs 8.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NTSX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for DGRE.

DGRE has the higher dividend yield at 1.20%, compared with 1.07% for NTSX.

DGRE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while NTSX is Diversified Portfolio. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for DGRE and 0.20% for NTSX.

DGRE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGRE and NTSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer