DGR.TO vs. CBCX.TO
DGR.TO (CI U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF) and CBCX.TO (CI Galaxy Blockchain Index ETF CAD) are both exchange-traded funds - DGR.TO is a Dividend fund managed by CI, while CBCX.TO is a Blockchain fund tracking the Alerian Galaxy Global Cryptocurrency-Focused Blockchain Technology NTR Hedged (CAD). Over the past 3 years, DGR.TO returned 12.68%/yr vs 46.73%/yr for CBCX.TO. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
DGR.TO vs. CBCX.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DGR.TO achieves a 5.64% return, which is significantly lower than CBCX.TO's 6.72% return.
DGR.TO
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- -1.64%
- YTD
- 5.64%
- 6M
- 5.56%
- 1Y
- 13.36%
- 3Y*
- 12.68%
- 5Y*
- 10.28%
- 10Y*
- —
CBCX.TO
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- -8.66%
- YTD
- 6.72%
- 6M
- 4.92%
- 1Y
- 36.52%
- 3Y*
- 46.73%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DGR.TO vs. CBCX.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGR.TO CI U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF | 5.64% | 10.57% | 16.04% | 17.92% | -1.03% |
CBCX.TO CI Galaxy Blockchain Index ETF CAD | 6.72% | 21.63% | 82.92% | 108.11% | -46.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between DGR.TO and CBCX.TO is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2022 | 0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DGR.TO vs. CBCX.TO — Risk / Return Rank
DGR.TO
CBCX.TO
DGR.TO vs. CBCX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF (DGR.TO) and CI Galaxy Blockchain Index ETF CAD (CBCX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DGR.TO | CBCX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.15 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.57 | 0.68 | +0.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.30 | 1.20 | +5.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DGR.TO vs. CBCX.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DGR.TO drawdown since its inception was -30.73%, smaller than the maximum CBCX.TO drawdown of -55.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGR.TO and CBCX.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DGR.TO | CBCX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.73% | -55.21% | +24.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.55% | -54.19% | +45.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.65% | -55.21% | +38.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.92% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.31% | -35.09% | +32.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.52% | -23.92% | +20.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.13% | 30.48% | -28.35% |
Volatility
DGR.TO vs. CBCX.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CI U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF (DGR.TO) is 3.43%, while CI Galaxy Blockchain Index ETF CAD (CBCX.TO) has a volatility of 17.68%. This indicates that DGR.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CBCX.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DGR.TO | CBCX.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.43% | 17.68% | -14.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.15% | 42.50% | -34.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.51% | 61.19% | -50.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.12% | 62.66% | -48.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.23% | 62.66% | -47.43% |
Dividends
DGR.TO vs. CBCX.TO - Dividend Comparison
DGR.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, more than CBCX.TO's 0.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBCX.TO CI Galaxy Blockchain Index ETF CAD | 0.03% | 0.14% | 0.13% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DGR.TO CI U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF | 1.15% | 1.24% | 0.94% | 1.53% | 1.70% | 1.26% | 1.29% | 1.67% | 1.94% | 1.29% | 0.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DGR.TO and CBCX.TO have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DGR.TO is categorized as Dividend, while CBCX.TO is Blockchain.
Find the right allocation for DGR.TO and CBCX.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer