PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGP vs. TQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGP vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DB Gold Double Long Exchange Traded Notes (DGP) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGP achieves a 1.01% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 64.46% return. Over the past 10 years, DGP has underperformed TQQQ with an annualized return of 20.46%, while TQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 45.33% annualized return.


DGP

1D
-1.70%
1M
-3.55%
YTD
1.01%
6M
5.64%
1Y
57.52%
3Y*
57.85%
5Y*
30.49%
10Y*
20.46%

TQQQ

1D
-0.76%
1M
33.35%
YTD
64.46%
6M
55.93%
1Y
137.89%
3Y*
69.49%
5Y*
28.37%
10Y*
45.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGP vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DGP
DB Gold Double Long Exchange Traded Notes
1.01%141.40%53.16%16.97%-5.54%-11.29%45.29%32.27%-7.48%24.20%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
64.46%34.35%58.27%198.04%-79.09%82.98%110.05%133.84%-19.79%118.06%

Correlation

The correlation between DGP and TQQQ is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2010

0.04

The correlation between DGP and TQQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (all time) to 0.21 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGP vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGP
DGP Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
DGP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGP Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
DGP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGP Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

TQQQ
TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGP vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DB Gold Double Long Exchange Traded Notes (DGP) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DGPTQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.40

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.58

3.75

-2.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.05

12.27

-8.22

DGP vs. TQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGP Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is lower than the TQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGP and TQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DGPTQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.10

2.92

-1.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.43

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.69

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.74

-0.46

Drawdowns

DGP vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGP drawdown since its inception was -75.31%, smaller than the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGP and TQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGPTQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.31%

-81.66%

+6.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.58%

-36.97%

+0.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.58%

-58.04%

+21.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.24%

-81.66%

+30.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.24%

-81.66%

+30.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.78%

-0.76%

-32.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.09%

-18.52%

-22.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.24%

11.28%

+2.96%

Volatility

DGP vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DB Gold Double Long Exchange Traded Notes (DGP) is 10.48%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 13.29%. This indicates that DGP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGPTQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.48%

13.29%

-2.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.34%

36.04%

+10.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

52.47%

47.60%

+4.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.77%

66.53%

-27.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.04%

65.96%

-30.92%

DGP vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGP has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than TQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

DGP vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison

DGP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGP
DB Gold Double Long Exchange Traded Notes
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
0.36%0.65%1.27%1.26%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


DGP and TQQQ have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TQQQ has higher volatility (13.29%) compared to DGP (10.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGP dropped -75.31% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.

On 10-year performance, TQQQ leads with 45.33% vs 20.46% for DGP. On fees, DGP is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, DGP has been the lower-risk option at 10.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 45.33% return vs 20.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGP is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TQQQ.

TQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.36%, compared with 0.00% for DGP.

DGP is categorized as Leveraged Commodities, while TQQQ is Leveraged Equities. DGP tracks Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity Index-Optimum Yield Gold (200%), while TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for DGP and 0.95% for TQQQ.

TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGP and TQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer