PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGP vs. CPXR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGP vs. CPXR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DB Gold Double Long Exchange Traded Notes (DGP) and USCF Daily Target 2X Copper Index ETF (CPXR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGP achieves a -18.18% return, which is significantly lower than CPXR's 20.21% return.


DGP

1D
-2.82%
1M
-3.42%
6M
-34.21%
YTD
-18.18%
1Y
28.29%
3Y*
48.17%
5Y*
27.47%
10Y*
16.04%
ALL TIME*
9.38%

CPXR

1D
1.31%
1M
11.94%
6M
12.04%
YTD
20.21%
1Y
83.67%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
37.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$409.02K$351.97K$733.40K
$15.23M$15.11M$28.98M

DGP vs. CPXR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DGP and CPXR is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2025

0.45

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGP vs. CPXR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DGP
DGP Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
DGP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGP Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
DGP Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGP Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

CPXR
CPXR Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
CPXR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CPXR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
CPXR Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
CPXR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
CPXR Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DGP vs. CPXR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DB Gold Double Long Exchange Traded Notes (DGP) and USCF Daily Target 2X Copper Index ETF (CPXR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DGPCPXRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.27

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.71

2.71

-2.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.52

7.86

-6.33

DGP vs. CPXR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGP Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is lower than the CPXR Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGP and CPXR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DGP vs. CPXR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGP drawdown since its inception was -75.31%, which is greater than CPXR's maximum drawdown of -47.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGP and CPXR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGPCPXRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.31%

-47.87%

-27.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.59%

-31.64%

-15.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-45.56%

-6.19%

-39.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.10%

-18.96%

-22.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.26%

10.90%

+11.36%

Volatility

DGP vs. CPXR - Volatility Comparison

DB Gold Double Long Exchange Traded Notes (DGP) and USCF Daily Target 2X Copper Index ETF (CPXR) have volatilities of 12.46% and 12.08%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGPCPXRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.46%

12.08%

+0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

47.60%

42.09%

+5.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

55.74%

56.10%

-0.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.73%

66.91%

-27.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.47%

66.91%

-31.44%

DGP vs. CPXR - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGP has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than CPXR's 1.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

DGP vs. CPXR - Dividend Comparison

DGP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CPXR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%.


Frequently Asked Questions


DGP and CPXR have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DGP has higher volatility (12.46%) compared to CPXR (12.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGP dropped -75.31% vs CPXR's -47.87%.

On 1-year performance, CPXR leads with 83.67% vs 28.29% for DGP. On fees, DGP is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, CPXR has been the lower-risk option at 12.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CPXR has performed better with a 83.67% return vs 28.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGP is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.20% for CPXR.

CPXR has the higher dividend yield at 0.58%, compared with 0.00% for DGP.

DGP is categorized as Leveraged Commodities, while CPXR is Copper. DGP tracks Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity Index-Optimum Yield Gold (200%), while CPXR tracks SummerHaven Copper Index. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and USCF. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for DGP and 1.20% for CPXR.

CPXR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGP and CPXR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer