PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGLRX vs. YFSNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGLRX vs. YFSNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Global Stock Fund (DGLRX) and AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N (YFSNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGLRX achieves a 3.43% return, which is significantly lower than YFSNX's 22.30% return.


DGLRX

1D
0.06%
1M
1.76%
6M
-0.33%
YTD
3.43%
1Y
6.12%
3Y*
11.36%
5Y*
6.60%
10Y*
10.97%

YFSNX

1D
0.97%
1M
-2.13%
6M
19.64%
YTD
22.30%
1Y
18.42%
3Y*
14.89%
5Y*
8.19%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGLRX vs. YFSNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DGLRX
BNY Mellon Global Stock Fund
3.43%8.59%17.14%21.48%-19.14%17.63%19.50%29.57%-1.69%20.74%
YFSNX
AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N
22.30%14.79%-0.47%16.48%-9.39%13.00%18.32%24.48%2.18%20.95%

Correlation

The correlation between DGLRX and YFSNX is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2017

0.70

Over the past year, the correlation between DGLRX and YFSNX has dropped to 0.42 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGLRX vs. YFSNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGLRX
DGLRX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
DGLRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGLRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGLRX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
DGLRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGLRX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

YFSNX
YFSNX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
YFSNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YFSNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
YFSNX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
YFSNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
YFSNX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGLRX vs. YFSNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Global Stock Fund (DGLRX) and AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N (YFSNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DGLRXYFSNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.20

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.46

1.29

-0.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.47

3.84

-2.37

DGLRX vs. YFSNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGLRX Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is lower than the YFSNX Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGLRX and YFSNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DGLRX vs. YFSNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGLRX drawdown since its inception was -43.83%, which is greater than YFSNX's maximum drawdown of -35.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGLRX and YFSNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGLRXYFSNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.83%

-35.14%

-8.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.27%

-14.09%

+2.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.00%

-14.29%

-1.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.20%

-25.26%

-3.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.14%

-4.55%

+3.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.93%

-4.94%

-0.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.50%

4.70%

-1.20%

Volatility

DGLRX vs. YFSNX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNY Mellon Global Stock Fund (DGLRX) is 4.19%, while AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N (YFSNX) has a volatility of 6.49%. This indicates that DGLRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YFSNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGLRXYFSNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.19%

6.49%

-2.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.22%

15.57%

-5.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.76%

22.22%

-9.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.59%

15.67%

+0.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.58%

16.33%

+0.25%

DGLRX vs. YFSNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGLRX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than YFSNX's 1.11% expense ratio.


Dividends

DGLRX vs. YFSNX - Dividend Comparison

DGLRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 29.98%, while YFSNX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGLRX
BNY Mellon Global Stock Fund
29.98%30.57%17.41%17.89%11.97%8.65%5.71%5.00%7.11%8.01%3.83%6.46%
YFSNX
AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N
0.00%0.00%8.40%7.86%4.33%8.06%4.71%6.59%0.71%2.63%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DGLRX and YFSNX have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YFSNX has higher volatility (6.49%) compared to DGLRX (4.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGLRX dropped -43.83% vs YFSNX's -35.14%.

YFSNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.82 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGLRX and YFSNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer