DGLO vs. ESN

Last updated Jul 11, 2026

DGLO (First Trust RBA Deglobalization ETF) and ESN (Essential 40 Stock ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. DGLO is actively managed, while ESN is passively managed. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.70% expense ratio.

Performance

DGLO vs. ESN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust RBA Deglobalization ETF (DGLO) and Essential 40 Stock ETF (ESN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DGLO having a 16.25% return and ESN slightly lower at 15.66%.

DGLO

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: -1.59%
• 6M: 9.42%
• YTD: 16.25%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ESN

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 1.08%
• 6M: 11.91%
• YTD: 15.66%
• 1Y: 23.39%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGLO vs. ESN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DGLO First Trust RBA Deglobalization ETF	16.25%	1.61%
ESN Essential 40 Stock ETF	15.66%	7.86%

Correlation

The correlation between DGLO and ESN is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 2025	0.67

Return for Risk

DGLO vs. ESN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGLO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ESN

ESN Risk / Return Rank: 85
ESN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
ESN Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
ESN Omega Ratio Rank: 83
ESN Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
ESN Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGLO vs. ESN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust RBA Deglobalization ETF (DGLO) and Essential 40 Stock ETF (ESN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DGLO	ESN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.28	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.17	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.39	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.52	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	13.82	—

Drawdowns

DGLO vs. ESN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGLO drawdown since its inception was -7.74%, smaller than the maximum ESN drawdown of -13.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGLO and ESN.

Drawdown Indicators

	DGLO	ESN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.74%	-13.60%	+5.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-6.42%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.59%	-1.13%	-0.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.96%	-1.83%	-0.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.65%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DGLO	ESN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.05%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	7.55%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.23%	9.95%	+5.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.23%	13.16%	+2.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.23%	13.16%	+2.07%

DGLO vs. ESN - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DGLO and ESN have an expense ratio of 0.70%.

Dividends

DGLO vs. ESN - Dividend Comparison

DGLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, less than ESN's 0.79% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
DGLO First Trust RBA Deglobalization ETF	0.58%	0.39%	0.00%
ESN Essential 40 Stock ETF	0.79%	0.91%	0.76%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DGLO and ESN in my portfolio?

DGLO and ESN have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DGLO or ESN?

Both ETFs have the same 0.70% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DGLO or ESN?

DGLO and ESN have the same expense ratio: 0.70% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DGLO or ESN?

ESN has the higher dividend yield at 0.79%, compared with 0.58% for DGLO.

What is the main difference between DGLO and ESN?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and KKM Financial.