DGJA vs. JANB
DGJA (FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Digital Return ETF - January) and JANB (Aptus January Buffer ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DGJA charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for JANB.
Performance
DGJA vs. JANB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DGJA
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- 0.46%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JANB
- 1D
- -1.00%
- 1M
- 0.53%
- YTD
- 5.22%
- 6M
- 6.07%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DGJA vs. JANB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
DGJA FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Digital Return ETF - January | 3.69% |
JANB Aptus January Buffer ETF | 5.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between DGJA and JANB is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2026 | 0.94 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DGJA vs. JANB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Digital Return ETF - January (DGJA) and Aptus January Buffer ETF (JANB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DGJA | JANB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.72 | 1.73 | 0.00 |
Drawdowns
DGJA vs. JANB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DGJA drawdown since its inception was -3.79%, smaller than the maximum JANB drawdown of -6.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGJA and JANB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DGJA | JANB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.79% | -6.52% | +2.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.56% | -1.03% | +0.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.56% | -1.13% | +0.57% |
Volatility
DGJA vs. JANB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DGJA | JANB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.88% | 7.48% | -1.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.88% | 7.48% | -1.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.88% | 7.48% | -1.60% |
DGJA vs. JANB - Expense Ratio Comparison
DGJA has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than JANB's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
DGJA vs. JANB - Dividend Comparison
Neither DGJA nor JANB has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, DGJA and JANB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, JANB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JANB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DGJA.
DGJA and JANB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Aptus Capital Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DGJA and 0.25% for JANB.
Find the right allocation for DGJA and JANB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer