PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGIFX vs. MHELX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGIFX vs. MHELX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Disciplined Growth Investors Fund (DGIFX) and MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund (MHELX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with DGIFX having a 17.45% return and MHELX slightly higher at 17.65%. Over the past 10 years, DGIFX has outperformed MHELX with an annualized return of 12.45%, while MHELX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.94% annualized return.


DGIFX

1D
0.76%
1M
6.56%
YTD
17.45%
6M
16.09%
1Y
25.48%
3Y*
17.88%
5Y*
10.48%
10Y*
12.45%

MHELX

1D
0.10%
1M
1.75%
YTD
17.65%
6M
20.19%
1Y
39.35%
3Y*
15.27%
5Y*
5.11%
10Y*
8.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGIFX vs. MHELX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DGIFX
Disciplined Growth Investors Fund
17.45%3.54%21.13%33.10%-18.35%9.59%24.07%23.97%-2.39%14.86%
MHELX
MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund
17.65%3.45%12.51%16.30%-20.27%14.07%20.57%22.49%-12.76%12.42%

Correlation

The correlation between DGIFX and MHELX is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2011

0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between DGIFX and MHELX has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGIFX vs. MHELX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGIFX
DGIFX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
DGIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
DGIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

MHELX
MHELX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
MHELX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MHELX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
MHELX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
MHELX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
MHELX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGIFX vs. MHELX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Disciplined Growth Investors Fund (DGIFX) and MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund (MHELX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DGIFXMHELXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.39

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.55

4.64

-2.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.92

15.69

-7.77

DGIFX vs. MHELX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGIFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the MHELX Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGIFX and MHELX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DGIFXMHELXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.80

2.06

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.24

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

0.43

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.33

+0.38

Drawdowns

DGIFX vs. MHELX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGIFX drawdown since its inception was -30.93%, smaller than the maximum MHELX drawdown of -61.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGIFX and MHELX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGIFXMHELXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.93%

-61.24%

+30.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.91%

-8.52%

-2.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.93%

-30.81%

-0.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.93%

-32.01%

+1.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.93%

-39.02%

+8.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.60%

+0.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.90%

-12.93%

+7.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.50%

2.51%

+0.99%

Volatility

DGIFX vs. MHELX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Disciplined Growth Investors Fund (DGIFX) is 4.23%, while MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund (MHELX) has a volatility of 4.53%. This indicates that DGIFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MHELX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGIFXMHELXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.23%

4.53%

-0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.14%

15.24%

-4.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.47%

19.23%

-3.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.11%

21.00%

+0.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.66%

20.97%

-2.31%

DGIFX vs. MHELX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGIFX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is lower than MHELX's 1.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

DGIFX vs. MHELX - Dividend Comparison

DGIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.02%, more than MHELX's 6.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGIFX
Disciplined Growth Investors Fund
7.02%8.29%20.95%2.78%2.21%11.12%10.09%3.53%3.74%4.29%0.00%0.00%
MHELX
MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund
6.13%0.00%2.19%0.00%14.45%5.03%2.70%6.13%0.00%5.17%5.51%6.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


DGIFX and MHELX have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MHELX has higher volatility (4.53%) compared to DGIFX (4.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGIFX dropped -30.93% vs MHELX's -61.24%.

MHELX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGIFX and MHELX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer