DGFFX vs. VTABX

Last updated Jun 20, 2026

DGFFX (Destinations Global Fixed Income Opportunities Fund) and VTABX (Vanguard Total International Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares) are both Global Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, DGFFX returned 3.71%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for VTABX. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DGFFX charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for VTABX.

Performance

DGFFX vs. VTABX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Destinations Global Fixed Income Opportunities Fund (DGFFX) and Vanguard Total International Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTABX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGFFX achieves a 2.77% return, which is significantly higher than VTABX's 1.08% return.

DGFFX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.72%
• YTD: 2.77%
• 6M: 2.95%
• 1Y: 6.29%
• 3Y*: 7.32%
• 5Y*: 3.71%
• 10Y*: —

VTABX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1.07%
• YTD: 1.08%
• 6M: 1.45%
• 1Y: 2.37%
• 3Y*: 4.40%
• 5Y*: 0.45%
• 10Y*: 1.83%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGFFX vs. VTABX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DGFFX Destinations Global Fixed Income Opportunities Fund	2.77%	5.84%	8.04%	7.82%	-6.09%	4.91%	3.59%	6.64%	-0.35%	3.57%
VTABX Vanguard Total International Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares	1.08%	2.96%	3.92%	8.77%	-12.92%	-2.22%	4.54%	8.83%	2.97%	3.08%

Correlation

The correlation between DGFFX and VTABX is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.43
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.39
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2017	0.28

The correlation between DGFFX and VTABX shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (all time) to 0.43 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

DGFFX vs. VTABX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGFFX

DGFFX Risk / Return Rank: 98
DGFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
DGFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
DGFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 97
DGFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
DGFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 98

VTABX

VTABX Risk / Return Rank: 9
VTABX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
VTABX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
VTABX Omega Ratio Rank: 9
VTABX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
VTABX Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGFFX vs. VTABX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Destinations Global Fixed Income Opportunities Fund (DGFFX) and Vanguard Total International Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTABX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DGFFX	VTABX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.80	0.76	+3.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	6.11	1.10	+5.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.92	1.14	+0.78
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.61	0.80	+5.81
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	29.92	2.18	+27.73

DGFFX vs. VTABX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGFFX Sharpe Ratio is 3.80, which is higher than the VTABX Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGFFX and VTABX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DGFFX vs. VTABX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGFFX drawdown since its inception was -12.69%, smaller than the maximum VTABX drawdown of -16.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGFFX and VTABX.

Drawdown Indicators

	DGFFX	VTABX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.69%	-16.16%	+3.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.19%	-2.90%	+1.71%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.38%	-2.90%	-0.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-8.17%	-15.81%	+7.64%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-16.16%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.11%	-0.79%	+0.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.32%	-3.04%	+1.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.45%	1.07%	-0.62%

Volatility

DGFFX vs. VTABX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Destinations Global Fixed Income Opportunities Fund (DGFFX) is 0.62%, while Vanguard Total International Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTABX) has a volatility of 1.01%. This indicates that DGFFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTABX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DGFFX	VTABX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.62%	1.01%	-0.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.47%	2.62%	-1.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.07%	3.07%	-1.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.42%	4.45%	-2.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.60%	3.62%	-1.02%

DGFFX vs. VTABX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGFFX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than VTABX's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

DGFFX vs. VTABX - Dividend Comparison

DGFFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.23%, more than VTABX's 4.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DGFFX Destinations Global Fixed Income Opportunities Fund	6.23%	5.52%	6.81%	4.95%	3.37%	4.14%	4.22%	4.18%	3.79%	2.94%	0.00%	0.00%
VTABX Vanguard Total International Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares	4.44%	4.36%	4.33%	4.39%	1.48%	3.70%	1.08%	4.28%	3.00%	2.23%	1.80%	1.64%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DGFFX and VTABX in my portfolio?

DGFFX and VTABX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DGFFX or VTABX?

VTABX has higher volatility (1.01%) compared to DGFFX (0.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGFFX dropped -12.69% vs VTABX's -16.16%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DGFFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.80 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.