PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFXIX vs. MCDWX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFXIX vs. MCDWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA Diversified Fixed Income Portfolio (DFXIX) and Manning & Napier Credit Series (MCDWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFXIX achieves a 0.83% return, which is significantly higher than MCDWX's 0.56% return.


DFXIX

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.83%
6M
0.84%
1Y
4.55%
3Y*
4.13%
5Y*
1.34%
10Y*

MCDWX

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.17%
YTD
0.56%
6M
0.80%
1Y
5.58%
3Y*
5.54%
5Y*
1.59%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFXIX vs. MCDWX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
DFXIX
DFA Diversified Fixed Income Portfolio
0.83%5.85%3.05%4.93%-7.88%-0.56%1.40%
MCDWX
Manning & Napier Credit Series
0.56%7.57%4.13%7.31%-11.13%0.01%8.77%

Correlation

The correlation between DFXIX and MCDWX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2020

0.87

The correlation between DFXIX and MCDWX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFXIX vs. MCDWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFXIX
DFXIX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
DFXIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFXIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFXIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
DFXIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFXIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

MCDWX
MCDWX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
MCDWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MCDWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
MCDWX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
MCDWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
MCDWX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFXIX vs. MCDWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Diversified Fixed Income Portfolio (DFXIX) and Manning & Napier Credit Series (MCDWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFXIXMCDWXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.66

1.82

-0.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.49

2.64

-0.16

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.36

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.70

2.52

+0.18

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.30

8.26

+0.04

DFXIX vs. MCDWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFXIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is comparable to the MCDWX Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFXIX and MCDWX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFXIXMCDWXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.66

1.82

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

0.34

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.59

-0.03

Drawdowns

DFXIX vs. MCDWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFXIX drawdown since its inception was -10.51%, smaller than the maximum MCDWX drawdown of -15.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFXIX and MCDWX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFXIXMCDWXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.51%

-15.96%

+5.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.69%

-2.17%

+0.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.00%

-4.22%

+2.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.51%

-15.96%

+5.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.76%

-0.95%

+0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.31%

-4.15%

+1.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.55%

0.66%

-0.11%

Volatility

DFXIX vs. MCDWX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DFA Diversified Fixed Income Portfolio (DFXIX) is 0.84%, while Manning & Napier Credit Series (MCDWX) has a volatility of 1.07%. This indicates that DFXIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MCDWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFXIXMCDWXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.84%

1.07%

-0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.86%

2.17%

-0.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.62%

2.96%

-0.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.59%

4.63%

-1.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.58%

4.38%

+25.20%

DFXIX vs. MCDWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFXIX has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than MCDWX's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DFXIX vs. MCDWX - Dividend Comparison

DFXIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.70%, less than MCDWX's 4.47% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DFXIX
DFA Diversified Fixed Income Portfolio
3.70%3.21%3.72%3.02%2.69%2.31%1.39%102.11%2.10%1.09%
MCDWX
Manning & Napier Credit Series
4.47%4.83%4.41%4.48%3.25%4.45%2.57%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFXIX and MCDWX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MCDWX has higher volatility (1.07%) compared to DFXIX (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFXIX dropped -10.51% vs MCDWX's -15.96%.

MCDWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFXIX and MCDWX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer