PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFWIX vs. RWIIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFWIX vs. RWIIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA World ex U.S. Core Equity Portfolio (DFWIX) and Redwood AlphaFactor Tactical International Fund (RWIIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFWIX achieves a 15.19% return, which is significantly higher than RWIIX's 7.48% return.


DFWIX

1D
0.05%
1M
2.27%
YTD
15.19%
6M
15.05%
1Y
33.26%
3Y*
20.39%
5Y*
11.88%
10Y*
11.82%

RWIIX

1D
-0.14%
1M
-0.50%
YTD
7.48%
6M
7.64%
1Y
20.25%
3Y*
4.78%
5Y*
1.58%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFWIX vs. RWIIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DFWIX
DFA World ex U.S. Core Equity Portfolio
15.19%33.45%4.34%16.74%-14.04%22.41%9.35%19.98%-17.00%1.13%
RWIIX
Redwood AlphaFactor Tactical International Fund
7.48%7.87%-6.03%9.07%-11.57%10.68%14.57%4.58%-2.46%0.62%

Correlation

The correlation between DFWIX and RWIIX is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 26, 2017

0.65

The correlation between DFWIX and RWIIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (all time) to 0.80 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFWIX vs. RWIIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFWIX
DFWIX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
DFWIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFWIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFWIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
DFWIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFWIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

RWIIX
RWIIX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
RWIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RWIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
RWIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
RWIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
RWIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFWIX vs. RWIIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA World ex U.S. Core Equity Portfolio (DFWIX) and Redwood AlphaFactor Tactical International Fund (RWIIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DFWIXRWIIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.34

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.18

2.93

+0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.35

7.65

+4.70

DFWIX vs. RWIIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFWIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is higher than the RWIIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFWIX and RWIIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DFWIX vs. RWIIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFWIX drawdown since its inception was -41.80%, which is greater than RWIIX's maximum drawdown of -20.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFWIX and RWIIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFWIXRWIIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.80%

-20.34%

-21.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.82%

-6.94%

-3.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.11%

-20.34%

+7.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.31%

-20.34%

-6.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.21%

-2.38%

+2.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.12%

-7.78%

-0.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.77%

2.65%

+0.12%

Volatility

DFWIX vs. RWIIX - Volatility Comparison

DFA World ex U.S. Core Equity Portfolio (DFWIX) has a higher volatility of 5.61% compared to Redwood AlphaFactor Tactical International Fund (RWIIX) at 4.12%. This indicates that DFWIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RWIIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFWIXRWIIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.61%

4.12%

+1.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.19%

9.08%

+3.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.10%

11.52%

+2.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.28%

11.63%

+3.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.64%

10.95%

+4.69%

DFWIX vs. RWIIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFWIX has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is lower than RWIIX's 1.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFWIX vs. RWIIX - Dividend Comparison

DFWIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, less than RWIIX's 8.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFWIX
DFA World ex U.S. Core Equity Portfolio
2.79%3.00%3.32%3.36%3.11%10.71%1.81%2.36%3.50%2.36%2.59%2.31%
RWIIX
Redwood AlphaFactor Tactical International Fund
8.13%8.74%0.00%6.82%1.72%14.15%6.51%1.84%0.86%0.02%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFWIX and RWIIX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFWIX has higher volatility (5.61%) compared to RWIIX (4.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFWIX dropped -41.80% vs RWIIX's -20.34%.

DFWIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFWIX and RWIIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer