PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFVX vs. DFAS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFVX vs. DFAS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional US Large Cap Vector ETF (DFVX) and Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF (DFAS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFVX achieves a 13.39% return, which is significantly lower than DFAS's 16.93% return.


DFVX

1D
1.45%
1M
1.68%
6M
8.85%
YTD
13.39%
1Y
23.19%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
21.51%

DFAS

1D
-0.17%
1M
-0.61%
6M
10.95%
YTD
16.93%
1Y
29.19%
3Y*
13.31%
5Y*
8.65%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$35.83M$42.77M$37.37M
$902.16K$893.51K$912.47K

DFVX vs. DFAS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
DFVX
Dimensional US Large Cap Vector ETF
13.39%15.35%17.72%10.84%
DFAS
Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF
16.93%8.17%10.21%20.07%

Correlation

The correlation between DFVX and DFAS is 0.83, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2023

0.84

The correlation between DFVX and DFAS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

DFVX vs. DFAS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DFVX
DFAS

Technology

17.4%
14.7%

Industrials

14.5%
19.0%

Financial Services

13.7%
19.6%

Communication Services

13.1%
2.5%

Consumer Cyclical

10.9%
13.1%

Healthcare

10.9%
13.0%

Energy

7.9%
5.9%

Consumer Defensive

7.4%
4.2%

Basic Materials

3.6%
4.8%

Utilities

0.4%
2.7%

Real Estate

0.1%
0.7%

Technology

DFVX
17.4%
DFAS
14.7%

Industrials

DFVX
14.5%
DFAS
19.0%

Financial Services

DFVX
13.7%
DFAS
19.6%

Communication Services

DFVX
13.1%
DFAS
2.5%

Consumer Cyclical

DFVX
10.9%
DFAS
13.1%

Healthcare

DFVX
10.9%
DFAS
13.0%

Energy

DFVX
7.9%
DFAS
5.9%

Consumer Defensive

DFVX
7.4%
DFAS
4.2%

Basic Materials

DFVX
3.6%
DFAS
4.8%

Utilities

DFVX
0.4%
DFAS
2.7%

Real Estate

DFVX
0.1%
DFAS
0.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFVX vs. DFAS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DFVX
DFVX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
DFVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFVX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
DFVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFVX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

DFAS
DFAS Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
DFAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFAS Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
DFAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFAS Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DFVX vs. DFAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional US Large Cap Vector ETF (DFVX) and Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF (DFAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DFVXDFASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.29

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.96

2.88

+0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.70

10.09

+2.61

DFVX vs. DFAS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is comparable to the DFAS Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFVX and DFAS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DFVX vs. DFAS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFVX drawdown since its inception was -16.71%, smaller than the maximum DFAS drawdown of -26.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFVX and DFAS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFVXDFASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.71%

-26.13%

+9.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.17%

-9.36%

+2.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.59%

+1.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.74%

-8.08%

+6.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.68%

2.67%

-0.99%

Volatility

DFVX vs. DFAS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional US Large Cap Vector ETF (DFVX) is 3.07%, while Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF (DFAS) has a volatility of 3.36%. This indicates that DFVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFVXDFASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.07%

3.36%

-0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.61%

11.54%

-2.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.31%

16.67%

-5.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.58%

20.67%

-7.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.58%

20.66%

-7.08%

DFVX vs. DFAS - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFVX has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than DFAS's 0.26% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DFVX vs. DFAS - Dividend Comparison

DFVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, more than DFAS's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
DFAS
Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF
0.98%0.99%0.93%1.00%1.03%2.87%
DFVX
Dimensional US Large Cap Vector ETF
1.14%1.21%1.22%0.32%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFVX and DFAS have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFAS has higher volatility (3.36%) compared to DFVX (3.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFVX dropped -16.71% vs DFAS's -26.13%.

On 1-year performance, DFAS leads with 29.19% vs 23.19% for DFVX. On fees, DFVX is cheaper at 0.22% per year. On volatility, DFVX has been the lower-risk option at 3.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DFAS has performed better with a 29.19% return vs 23.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DFVX is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.26% for DFAS.

DFVX has the higher dividend yield at 1.14%, compared with 0.98% for DFAS.

DFVX is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while DFAS is Small Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for DFVX and 0.26% for DFAS.

DFVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFVX and DFAS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer