DFUV vs. SCHD
DFUV (Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DFUV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional, while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. DFUV is actively managed, while SCHD is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DFUV returned 17.41%/yr vs 14.19%/yr for SCHD. Their correlation of 0.86 means they have usually moved in the same direction. DFUV charges 0.21%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
DFUV vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFUV achieves a 20.16% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 24.03% return.
DFUV
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 1.35%
- 6M
- 14.55%
- YTD
- 20.16%
- 1Y
- 34.64%
- 3Y*
- 17.41%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.13%
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 3.33%
- 6M
- 14.09%
- YTD
- 24.03%
- 1Y
- 31.54%
- 3Y*
- 14.19%
- 5Y*
- 9.54%
- 10Y*
- 12.76%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.39%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $24.58M | $21.37M | $22.37M | |
| $786.88M | $715.86M | $685.58M |
DFUV vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFUV Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF | 20.16% | 15.77% | 11.79% | 13.25% | -0.71% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 24.03% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | 0.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFUV and SCHD is 0.65, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2022 | 0.86 |
Over the past year, the correlation between DFUV and SCHD has dropped to 0.65 - well below their long-term average of 0.86, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
DFUV vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DFUV
SCHD
Financial Services
Healthcare
Technology
Industrials
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
-
Utilities
Financial Services
DFUV
SCHD
Healthcare
DFUV
SCHD
Technology
DFUV
SCHD
Industrials
DFUV
SCHD
Energy
DFUV
SCHD
Consumer Cyclical
DFUV
SCHD
Basic Materials
DFUV
SCHD
Communication Services
DFUV
SCHD
Consumer Defensive
DFUV
SCHD
Real Estate
DFUV
SCHD
-
Utilities
DFUV
SCHD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFUV vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
DFUV
SCHD
DFUV vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF (DFUV) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DFUV | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.51 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.47 | 6.74 | -1.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.64 | 17.01 | +3.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DFUV vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFUV drawdown since its inception was -17.60%, smaller than the maximum SCHD drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFUV and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFUV | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.60% | -33.37% | +15.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.01% | -4.61% | -1.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.60% | -16.13% | -1.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.38% | -1.24% | +0.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.54% | -3.30% | -0.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.59% | 1.82% | -0.23% |
Volatility
DFUV vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF (DFUV) is 2.63%, while Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) has a volatility of 4.11%. This indicates that DFUV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFUV | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.63% | 4.11% | -1.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.65% | 8.11% | +0.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.02% | 11.13% | +0.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.12% | 14.39% | +1.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.12% | 16.72% | -0.60% |
DFUV vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFUV has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DFUV vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
DFUV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, less than SCHD's 3.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFUV Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF | 1.30% | 1.55% | 1.64% | 1.72% | 1.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.13% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFUV and SCHD have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHD has higher volatility (4.11%) compared to DFUV (2.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFUV dropped -17.60% vs SCHD's -33.37%.
On 3-year performance, DFUV leads with 17.41% vs 14.19% for SCHD. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, DFUV has been the lower-risk option at 2.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DFUV has performed better with a 17.41% return vs 14.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.21% for DFUV.
SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.13%, compared with 1.30% for DFUV.
DFUV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.21% for DFUV and 0.06% for SCHD.
SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 2.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFUV and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer