DFUSX vs. DMREX
DFUSX (DFA U.S. Large Company Portfolio) and DMREX (DFA Municipal Real Return Portfolio) are both mutual funds - DFUSX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Dimensional, while DMREX is a Municipal Bonds fund managed by Dimensional. Over the past 10 years, DFUSX returned 15.52%/yr vs 2.88%/yr for DMREX. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DFUSX charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for DMREX.
Performance
DFUSX vs. DMREX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFUSX achieves a 11.70% return, which is significantly higher than DMREX's 2.23% return. Over the past 10 years, DFUSX has outperformed DMREX with an annualized return of 15.52%, while DMREX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.88% annualized return.
DFUSX
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 5.79%
- YTD
- 11.70%
- 6M
- 11.72%
- 1Y
- 28.90%
- 3Y*
- 22.69%
- 5Y*
- 14.21%
- 10Y*
- 15.52%
DMREX
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 2.23%
- 6M
- 2.29%
- 1Y
- 3.60%
- 3Y*
- 3.40%
- 5Y*
- 2.55%
- 10Y*
- 2.88%
DFUSX vs. DMREX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFUSX DFA U.S. Large Company Portfolio | 11.70% | 17.76% | 24.91% | 26.28% | -18.14% | 28.53% | 18.41% | 32.08% | -4.45% | 21.04% |
DMREX DFA Municipal Real Return Portfolio | 2.23% | 2.77% | 3.10% | 2.56% | -1.42% | 6.75% | 4.11% | 6.64% | -0.51% | 2.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFUSX and DMREX is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2015 | 0.19 |
The correlation between DFUSX and DMREX shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.20 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFUSX vs. DMREX — Risk / Return Rank
DFUSX
DMREX
DFUSX vs. DMREX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA U.S. Large Company Portfolio (DFUSX) and DFA Municipal Real Return Portfolio (DMREX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFUSX | DMREX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 2.12 | -0.66 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.39 | 7.10 | -3.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.85 | 16.54 | -0.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFUSX | DMREX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.60 | 3.67 | -1.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 | 1.04 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 | 0.92 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.88 | -0.42 |
Drawdowns
DFUSX vs. DMREX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFUSX drawdown since its inception was -54.96%, which is greater than DMREX's maximum drawdown of -13.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFUSX and DMREX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFUSX | DMREX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.96% | -13.22% | -41.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.88% | -0.51% | -8.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.76% | -2.48% | -16.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.58% | -5.33% | -19.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.79% | -13.22% | -20.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.60% | -0.88% | -9.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.88% | 0.22% | +1.66% |
Volatility
DFUSX vs. DMREX - Volatility Comparison
DFA U.S. Large Company Portfolio (DFUSX) has a higher volatility of 2.81% compared to DFA Municipal Real Return Portfolio (DMREX) at 0.39%. This indicates that DFUSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DMREX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFUSX | DMREX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.81% | 0.39% | +2.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.99% | 0.79% | +8.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.55% | 0.99% | +10.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.87% | 2.45% | +14.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.07% | 3.14% | +14.93% |
DFUSX vs. DMREX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFUSX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than DMREX's 0.24% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DFUSX vs. DMREX - Dividend Comparison
DFUSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, less than DMREX's 3.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFUSX DFA U.S. Large Company Portfolio | 0.95% | 1.04% | 1.24% | 4.17% | 6.24% | 6.57% | 3.82% | 2.74% | 2.64% | 1.56% | 1.95% | 2.87% |
DMREX DFA Municipal Real Return Portfolio | 3.24% | 2.95% | 3.55% | 1.96% | 1.16% | 0.98% | 1.44% | 2.26% | 1.54% | 1.32% | 1.15% | 1.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFUSX and DMREX have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DFUSX has higher volatility (2.81%) compared to DMREX (0.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFUSX dropped -54.96% vs DMREX's -13.22%.
DMREX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.67 vs 2.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFUSX and DMREX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer