PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFUS vs. SPXM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFUS vs. SPXM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF (DFUS) and Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


DFUS

1D
0.39%
1M
1.62%
6M
9.17%
YTD
11.37%
1Y
22.36%
3Y*
20.26%
5Y*
12.93%
10Y*

SPXM

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
6M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
1Y
8.61%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFUS vs. SPXM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
DFUS
Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF
11.37%10.48%
SPXM
Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF
0.00%9.27%

Correlation

The correlation between DFUS and SPXM is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2025

0.53

The correlation between DFUS and SPXM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFUS vs. SPXM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFUS
DFUS Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
DFUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
DFUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

SPXM
SPXM Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
SPXM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPXM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPXM Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
SPXM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPXM Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFUS vs. SPXM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF (DFUS) and Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DFUSSPXMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.38

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.51

2.09

+0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.92

9.77

+1.15

DFUS vs. SPXM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFUS Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is comparable to the SPXM Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFUS and SPXM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DFUS vs. SPXM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFUS drawdown since its inception was -24.62%, which is greater than SPXM's maximum drawdown of -5.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFUS and SPXM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFUSSPXMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.62%

-5.08%

-19.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.96%

-5.08%

-3.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.55%

-0.75%

+0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.73%

-0.78%

-4.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.05%

Volatility

DFUS vs. SPXM - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF (DFUS) has a higher volatility of 3.81% compared to Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM) at 0.00%. This indicates that DFUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPXM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFUSSPXMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.81%

0.00%

+3.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.24%

3.96%

+6.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.95%

7.66%

+5.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.29%

7.63%

+9.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.19%

7.63%

+9.56%

DFUS vs. SPXM - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFUS has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than SPXM's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFUS vs. SPXM - Dividend Comparison

DFUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, more than SPXM's 0.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
DFUS
Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF
0.86%0.88%1.04%1.33%1.48%0.85%
SPXM
Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF
0.24%0.24%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFUS and SPXM have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFUS has higher volatility (3.81%) compared to SPXM (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFUS dropped -24.62% vs SPXM's -5.08%.

On 1-year performance, DFUS leads with 22.36% vs 8.61% for SPXM. On fees, DFUS is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPXM has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DFUS has performed better with a 22.36% return vs 8.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DFUS is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for SPXM.

DFUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.86%, compared with 0.24% for SPXM.

They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Azoria. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for DFUS and 0.47% for SPXM.

DFUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFUS and SPXM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer