DFTT vs. FJUN
DFTT (DF Tactical 30 ETF) and FJUN (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June) are both exchange-traded funds - DFTT is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the DF Risk-Managed Tactical Top 30 Index, while FJUN is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index June. Both are passively managed. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DFTT charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for FJUN.
Performance
DFTT vs. FJUN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFTT achieves a 17.89% return, which is significantly higher than FJUN's 5.57% return.
DFTT
- 1D
- -3.68%
- 1M
- -6.57%
- 6M
- 13.63%
- YTD
- 17.89%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FJUN
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 0.58%
- 6M
- 4.77%
- YTD
- 5.57%
- 1Y
- 11.77%
- 3Y*
- 12.79%
- 5Y*
- 10.75%
- 10Y*
- —
DFTT vs. FJUN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DFTT DF Tactical 30 ETF | 17.89% | -0.00% |
FJUN FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June | 5.57% | 1.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFTT and FJUN is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2025 | 0.75 |
DFTT vs. FJUN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DFTT
FJUN
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
DFTT
FJUN
Communication Services
DFTT
FJUN
Financial Services
DFTT
FJUN
Industrials
DFTT
FJUN
Healthcare
DFTT
FJUN
Utilities
DFTT
FJUN
Basic Materials
DFTT
-
FJUN
Consumer Cyclical
DFTT
-
FJUN
Consumer Defensive
DFTT
-
FJUN
Energy
DFTT
-
FJUN
Real Estate
DFTT
-
FJUN
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFTT vs. FJUN — Risk / Return Rank
DFTT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FJUN
DFTT vs. FJUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DF Tactical 30 ETF (DFTT) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June (FJUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DFTT | FJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.43 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.86 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 16.18 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DFTT vs. FJUN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFTT drawdown since its inception was -10.46%, smaller than the maximum FJUN drawdown of -13.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFTT and FJUN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFTT | FJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.46% | -13.26% | +2.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.26% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -13.26% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.03% | -0.28% | -8.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.44% | -1.65% | -0.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.73% | — |
Volatility
DFTT vs. FJUN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFTT | FJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.99% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 4.68% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.69% | 5.78% | +19.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.69% | 10.57% | +15.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.69% | 10.22% | +15.47% |
DFTT vs. FJUN - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFTT has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than FJUN's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFTT vs. FJUN - Dividend Comparison
DFTT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, while FJUN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
DFTT DF Tactical 30 ETF | 0.14% |
FJUN FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - June | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFTT and FJUN have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DFTT is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DFTT is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FJUN.
DFTT has the higher dividend yield at 0.14%, compared with 0.00% for FJUN.
DFTT is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FJUN is Defined Outcome. DFTT tracks DF Risk-Managed Tactical Top 30 Index, while FJUN tracks Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index June. They also come from different issuers: Donoghue Forlines and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for DFTT and 0.85% for FJUN.
Find the right allocation for DFTT and FJUN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer