DFTT vs. EBI

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

DFTT (DF Tactical 30 ETF) and EBI (Longview Advantage ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. DFTT is passively managed, while EBI is actively managed. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DFTT charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for EBI.

Performance

DFTT vs. EBI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DF Tactical 30 ETF (DFTT) and Longview Advantage ETF (EBI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFTT achieves a 23.84% return, which is significantly higher than EBI's 14.86% return.

DFTT

• 1D: 0.32%
• 1M: 8.26%
• YTD: 23.84%
• 6M: 24.33%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EBI

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: 3.43%
• YTD: 14.86%
• 6M: 15.24%
• 1Y: 34.11%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFTT vs. EBI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DFTT DF Tactical 30 ETF	23.84%	-0.04%
EBI Longview Advantage ETF	14.86%	1.59%

Correlation

The correlation between DFTT and EBI is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2025	0.77

Return for Risk

DFTT vs. EBI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EBI

EBI Risk / Return Rank: 87
EBI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
EBI Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
EBI Omega Ratio Rank: 85
EBI Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
EBI Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFTT vs. EBI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DF Tactical 30 ETF (DFTT) and Longview Advantage ETF (EBI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DFTT	EBI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.83	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.14	1.42	+0.72

Drawdowns

DFTT vs. EBI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFTT drawdown since its inception was -10.46%, smaller than the maximum EBI drawdown of -17.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFTT and EBI.

Drawdown Indicators

	DFTT	EBI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.46%	-17.05%	+6.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-7.09%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.24%	+0.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.22%	-2.06%	-0.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.72%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DFTT	EBI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.85%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.80%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.18%	12.13%	+10.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.18%	17.93%	+4.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.18%	17.93%	+4.25%

DFTT vs. EBI - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFTT has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than EBI's 0.24% expense ratio.

Dividends

DFTT vs. EBI - Dividend Comparison

DFTT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EBI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%.

Position	TTM	2025
DFTT DF Tactical 30 ETF	0.00%	0.00%
EBI Longview Advantage ETF	0.92%	1.05%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DFTT and EBI in my portfolio?

DFTT and EBI have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DFTT or EBI?

On fees, EBI is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DFTT or EBI?

EBI is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for DFTT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DFTT or EBI?

EBI has the higher dividend yield at 0.92%, compared with 0.00% for DFTT.

What is the main difference between DFTT and EBI?

They also come from different issuers: Donoghue Forlines and Longview. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for DFTT and 0.24% for EBI.